Resistive force against a bullet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the resistive force against a bullet using principles of conservation of energy and impulse. The user initially attempted to apply the equation KE(i) - KE(f) = F*L to determine the work done by friction but found discrepancies in their results compared to their teacher's solution. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in defining "force of resistance" and explores different approaches, including treating the problem as an impulse scenario to calculate contact time. Ultimately, the user concludes that their calculated force of 66,000N is significantly different from the teacher's 108N, indicating a potential error in the provided solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and its calculations
  • Familiarity with the principles of conservation of energy
  • Knowledge of impulse and momentum concepts
  • Basic physics background, particularly in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of conservation of energy in mechanics
  • Learn about impulse-momentum theorem and its applications
  • Study the concept of friction and its role in resistive forces
  • Explore common pitfalls in physics problem-solving and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of resistive forces in motion.

Deckname
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A bullet of mass 20g hits a steel plate at 600m/s and ricochets in the direction of CD at 500m/s. The bullet makes an indentation in the plate of length 50mm with an entering and exiting angle of beta. The angle alpha between the leaving velocity vector and the horizon is 30°

Calculate the average force of resistance the steel plate is providing the bullet with.

Solution: 9.46x10^7 N
Relevant Equations
(1/2)mv^2
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
 

Attachments

  • 20190411_232610.jpg
    20190411_232610.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 264
Physics news on Phys.org
Deckname said:
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
"Force of resistance" may be ambiguous. The plate resists being penetrated, so it might mean the average force exerted.

Imagine the bullet had entered a smoothly curving tube, deflecting the bullet with no loss of speed. Would you conclude the tube had exerted no force on the bullet?

(But I get a smaller answer too.)

Edit: are you sure the bullet is initially moving horizontally?
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks for the reply. Appreciate it.

I translated this problem from my native language, but yeah I'm not too sure either, but literally translated it means calculate the middle force of resistance, which I suppose means the average force of resistance, if we assume the force of friction getting lower the less momentum the bullet has, if that's how it works. I have to admit, I don't have a strong background in physics and have only started learning it a year ago, depending on what my course requires me.

I tried a different approach though, I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time. And arrived at pretty much the same result I have already posted in my picture.

Regarding the entering angle of the velocity vector, it doesn't explicitly state that it's horizontal, but I can clearly see it in the picture I drew it from.

Also, there's a fair possibility that the solution provided by my teacher is wrong, since this is the case with a few other problems I've been assigned as well. But then again, usually the answers deviate by a few hundreds of Newtons sometimes, and not by a few orders of a magnitude like here, so that's what's getting me worked up.

I can't seem to get nowhere near his answer, assuming it's correct.
 
Deckname said:
I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time.
That is the better approach, but as you say it only leads to 66000N, not 108N. Indeed, even if the bullet bounced straight back, causing a 5mm indent, all at constant speed, you would still not get to 108.

I wondered if your teacher had forgotten to square root somewhere, but that seems to give even larger numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
816
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K