Resolving Forces: Logic & Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yh Hoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Resolution
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the resolution of forces, particularly how a single force can be broken down into components in two dimensions. It questions the logic behind resolving forces acting perpendicular to the x-axis or y-axis, especially in scenarios like inclined planes where gravitational force is involved. The conversation highlights that while resolving forces into components, some components may cancel each other out, raising questions about their existence and impact. It suggests that forces may be interactions with surrounding objects, leading to the idea that forces can be resolved in multiple ways. The thread emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding force resolution and its implications.
Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have been thinking about the logic of resolution of a main force into its component forces. Up to my stage i have just come across with the 2-dimension force which take x-axis and y-axis as their basis. So if they take y and x-axis as the basis for the components of a single force, supposedly a force that acts perpendicularly to the horizontal x-axis or vertical y-axis should have no vertical components or horizontal components respectively.
Yet, while explaining the objects on an inclined plane with only its vertically downwards gravitational force(weight), people tends to resolve the only force which acts perpendicularly to the x-axis into 2 component forces, one of which acts parallel to the inclined plane while the other acts perpendicular to the inclined plane.Note that if we again resolve the 2 forces above into x-components and y-components, we find that these 2 forces have their x-components opposing each other and consequently cancel out ache other! it seems like logically these x-components originally are NOT EXISTED ! instead , we resolve them out and meanwhile they impart effects on the object as Action ! Mathematically, let's say we have a quantity 5. We say
5 = 10 - 5 , note that the quantity is never existed let's alone imparting any effects on the surrounding! the things we have now is only The 5! That's it. But why can we resolve in this way?? Maybe there is some misconception . Or is it because the force is actually an INTERACTION with the surrounding objects that will dependently affects the other objects in contact?? If it is true, meaning the force can be resolved in infinite ways as in figure 3. could somebody explain clearly for me?? Thanks you very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
10=5+5 or 1+9 or 15-5 or 1+2+2+5 or 1+2+2+3+2 ...
Or 10=1+9=1+(6+3)
Likewise any vector can be resolved to any number of vectors.
Or a vector can be the sum of any number of vectors.
 
This thread deals with just the same question and it may be best to confine the discussion in just one thread or someone could miss some of the contributions.
 
Yes sir. Sorry because i faced problem in uploading photo as attachment. So there is a need for me to create another thread.:smile:
 
Ah, I see.
It's not too difficult to do that (on my browser, at least)
Just go to the 'advanced' option for a reply.
Perhaps it's a test of your 'resolution'? :biggrin:
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K