Resonance structures of aryl or vinyl carbocations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the resonance structures of aryl and vinyl carbocations, exploring the concept of resonance stabilization and hybridization changes. Participants examine the differences in resonance behavior between these carbocations and compounds like benzonitrile, questioning the validity of certain resonance structures and the implications of hybridization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why vinyl and aryl carbocations lack resonance stabilization, suggesting that changes in hybridization (sp to sp2) may prevent delocalization.
  • Another participant argues that the nitrogen in benzonitrile can maintain sp hybridization across resonance structures, unlike the carbocations in question.
  • Concerns are raised about the geometric considerations of vinylic carbocations, with a participant noting that some resonance structures may be unreasonable based on geometry.
  • There is a discussion about the possibility of hybridization changes in resonance structures, with one participant asserting that hybridization is not a measurable quality and can be chosen within certain bounds.
  • A later reply suggests that certain resonance structures for the carbocations may indeed be valid without hybridization changes, prompting further inquiry into their feasibility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of resonance structures for aryl and vinyl carbocations, with no consensus reached on the implications of hybridization changes or the reasonableness of certain structures.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering geometry and hybridization in resonance structures, indicating that assumptions about these factors may affect the discussion. The exploration of resonance structures remains open to interpretation and debate.

sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
I read that vinyl or aryl carbocations do not have resonance stabilization but I can't understand why that is the case. Below I have drawn some resonance structures for aryl and vinyl carbocations:

Aryl carbocation: https://imgur.com/QwiHJg8
Vinyl carbocation: https://imgur.com/rKBs57d

In both images, the bottom resonance structures results in the carbocation to change in its hybridization (sp to sp2) which seems like its the reason why the delocalization is not possible. However, in benzonitrile the nitrogen at the edge changes from an sp hybridization to an sp2 hybridization as well in the resonance structures it forms (https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9c9c4891e3c59fe96adbc8caf19efc6a?convert_to_webp=true ). So why is it okay for benzonitrile to change its hybridization in this manner while this cannot happen for the vinyl/aryl carbocation?

For the top images, why can't the electrons delocalize in that manner? Would it be because for that to happen, the electrons would have to delocalize into the other p orbital that is empty which is not parallel to the other p orbitals?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sgstudent said:
In both images, the bottom resonance structures results in the carbocation to change in its hybridization (sp to sp2) which seems like its the reason why the delocalization is not possible. However, in benzonitrile the nitrogen at the edge changes from an sp hybridization to an sp2 hybridization as well in the resonance structures it forms (https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9c9c4891e3c59fe96adbc8caf19efc6a?convert_to_webp=true ). So why is it okay for benzonitrile to change its hybridization in this manner while this cannot happen for the vinyl/aryl carbocation?
The N in Benzonitrile can be perfectly described using a sp hybridization in all the resonance structures present.
In the case of vinylic or arylic carbocations, some of the resonance structures you draw are unreasonable if you take the proper geometry of the cation into account (which won't be linear in the case of a vinylic carbocation).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DrDu said:
The N in Benzonitrile can be perfectly described using a sp hybridization in all the resonance structures present.
In the case of vinylic or arylic carbocations, some of the resonance structures you draw are unreasonable if you take the proper geometry of the cation into account (which won't be linear in the case of a vinylic carbocation).

Wouldn't the nitrogen have a sp2 hybridization in all but the first resonance structure?

Also, wouldn't this part of your reply "some of the resonance structures you draw are unreasonable if you take the proper geometry of the cation into account" be relevant for the bottom structures only where the hybridization of the carbon changes from sp to sp2? But even so why can't there be a change in the hybridization?

Also, what about the top structures? Why can't those resonance structures exist?
 
Hybridization is not a measurable quality of a molecule but is - within certain bounds - free for you to choose. Hence the bonding in the benzonitrile is perfectly well describable with an sp-hybridization on N for all structures.
I am not sure what you mean with the bottom structures and for which atom exactly you want to change hybridization.
 
DrDu said:
Hybridization is not a measurable quality of a molecule but is - within certain bounds - free for you to choose. Hence the bonding in the benzonitrile is perfectly well describable with an sp-hybridization on N for all structures.
I am not sure what you mean with the bottom structures and for which atom exactly you want to change hybridization.

Oh I see. By the bottom structures I was referring to this: https://imgur.com/wOrj1Q5

After much thought, it seems like these resonance structures are possible. There isn't any change in hybridization in any atom also. Is this possible though?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
24K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K