REU letter: comments? criticisms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vincebs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reu
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the evaluation and improvement of a letter written for a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) application, specifically for a Canadian university's NSERC program. Participants provide feedback on the content, structure, and personal engagement of the letter, focusing on how to enhance its effectiveness.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the letter could benefit from a more personal touch, encouraging the author to express why specific topics are interesting to them rather than presenting a list of interests.
  • One participant advises against using phrases like "if you are looking," recommending that the author should directly address how they fit into the research program and demonstrate their suitability.
  • The author shares a revised version of the letter, incorporating some feedback by adding personal motivations and detailing previous research experiences more explicitly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on how to improve the letter, indicating that there is no consensus on the best approach. Feedback is constructive but highlights different perspectives on personal engagement and presentation.

Contextual Notes

Some suggestions involve subjective interpretations of what makes a compelling application letter, which may depend on individual preferences and the specific expectations of the NSERC program.

vincebs
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
My REU letter: comments? criticisms?

Hey everyone,

I wrote the following REU letter, it's for a Canadian university. (NSERC is kind of like the Canadian equivalent of the National Science Foundation). I'd greatly appreciate it if you all could evaluate it. Any things I should add or take out? Anything that should be rephrased? Is the length alright? It kind of feels short to me at the moment...

---

I'm a student in the Physics Specialist Program at the University of Toronto. My career intention is to pursue graduate study in physics. The two fields that I am seriously considering to pursue are experimental particle physics and experimental condensed matter. This is a direction I have taken myself toward, as my interest in physics is in quantum mechanics and interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels. For this reason, I am particularly interested in matter in the presence of high-energy radiation and magnetic fields. Related to this, I am attracted to research into high Tc superconductivity as well as cooling and trapping techniques for cold atoms. In the high energy area, what interest me are neutrino oscillations and the interaction of particles with the Higgs field. I intend that by participating in the NSERC USRA program, I will gain further practical experience in the use of modern experimental apparatuses in physics that I first became acquainted with in my 3rd-year experimental physics laboratory course.

If you are looking for a student with previous physics research experience, I am currently working with a professor to design an optical imaging system using CODE V software for his cold atoms apparatus. I was a research assistant this summer responsible for performing IR/Raman frequency calculations with GAUSSIAN software on large carbon-based molecules. In 2005, I was a member of a group researching Bose-Einstein Condensate as part of my second-year physics laboratory course.

---

Thanks a lot,
Vince
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By the way, USRA = undergraduate student research award

Could someone give me their thoughts on this?
 
my 2 cents:
1. perhaps you can tell more about why things are interesting to you? the statement doesn't seem personal to me... it seems like a list of things someone might be interested in. perhaps make it more personal? maybe state some specific work that you do in previous research experience and how they enhance your knowledge?

2. i don't think it's a good idea to say "if you are looking". You should address how you fit into their research program, and how you are what they are looking for.
 
thanks for the advice tim_lou, i'll keep these two things in mind
 
Can anyone else provide some input to this letter?

Here is a revised versioN:

I am a student in the Physics Specialist Program at the University of Toronto. My career intention is to pursue graduate study in physics and join the physics research community. The two fields that I am seriously considering to pursue are experimental particle physics and experimental condensed matter. This is a direction I have taken myself toward, as my interest in physics is in quantum mechanics and interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels. Personally, I’ve been interested in these phenomena since having read books about the very small when I was younger, which inspired me to learn more about what is different in the submicroscopic world. For this reason, I am particularly interested in matter in the presence of high-energy radiation and magnetic fields. Related to this, I am attracted to research into high Tc superconductivity as well as cooling and trapping techniques for cold atoms. In the high energy area, what interest me are neutrino oscillations and the interaction of particles with the Higgs field. I intend that by participating in the NSERC USRA program, I will gain further practical experience in the use of modern experimental apparatuses in physics that I first became acquainted with in my 3rd-year experimental physics laboratory course.

In terms of previous physics research experience, I am currently working with a professor to design an optical imaging system using CODE V software for his cold atoms apparatus. From this I was able to obtain an understanding of the design of multiple-element optical systems and the diagnostic criteria used to evaluate them. I was a research assistant this summer responsible for performing IR/Raman frequency calculations with GAUSSIAN software on large carbon-based molecules. This experience led me to understand the concepts behind density functional theory (DFT) calculations for combining atomic orbitals, as well as Raman and IR spectra. In 2005, I was a member of a group researching Bose-Einstein Condensate as part of my second-year physics laboratory course which familiarized me with cooling and trapping techniques in cold atom experiments.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K