Reversible & non reversible internal combustion engines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engines. A reversible engine can operate in both directions of rotation, commonly seen in two-stroke engines, while four-stroke engines typically function in one direction due to their mechanically linked valvetrains. Although there are claims of reversible four-stroke engines, they require significant modifications such as independent valvetrain actuation and custom components. Ultimately, the consensus is that true reversible internal combustion engines do not exist in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of two-stroke and four-stroke engine mechanics
  • Knowledge of valvetrain operation and its impact on engine performance
  • Familiarity with combustion processes and thermodynamics
  • Experience with engine modification techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of two-stroke engines and their reversible operation
  • Explore valvetrain actuation methods independent of crankshaft rotation
  • Investigate the feasibility of reversible four-stroke engines and required modifications
  • Learn about combustion processes and their irreversibility in internal combustion engines
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive mechanics, and enthusiasts interested in internal combustion engine design and modifications, particularly those exploring the concepts of engine reversibility.

boyce59
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please can someone explain clearly in perhaps lay man terms the difference between REVERSIBLE & NON REVERSIBLE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It depends on whether you are talking about a reversible thermodynamic process or a real world engine.

If you are talking about something that could actually exist (my assumption of your question) then a reversible engine is one that will operate in either direction of rotation. It is more common for 2 stroke engines since no real valvetrain modification is necessary (when only done for short periods). In this case, only the starter mechanism must be reversed.

I've heard that reversible 4 stroke engines exist, but these would have to have valvetrains that are actuated by some other method than simply being driven mechanically off of the crankshaft. Typically 4 stroke engines are only able to function in one direction of rotation because the valvetrain is mechanically linked to the crankshaft rotation. This means that if you spin the crankshaft backwards, you will reverse the action of the intake and exhaust valves. The entire intake and exhaust systems are designed to function in one direction. Reversing that would be poorly efficient at best and most likely render the engine inoperable.

Basic answer- In the real world a reversible engine is one that can function in both directions of rotation. A nonreversible can only operate in one direction of rotation.

If you were asking about a reversible thermodynamic process, then that is another discussion, the simple answer being one is an ideal process and the other is what actually exists in the real world.
 
There are no reversible internal combustion engines! To prove this, try turning the crankshaft and wait for the exhaust gases to get sucked in and become fine fuel droplets mixed with air agian.
 
Dickfore said:
There are no reversible internal combustion engines! To prove this, try turning the crankshaft and wait for the exhaust gases to get sucked in and become fine fuel droplets mixed with air agian.

Certainly not true of two strokes.

As for four strokes, although mostly a good point, this could be remedied by direct injection or valvetrain actuation that is not mechanically linked to the crankshaft.

To concede, I have never seen any evidence of a reversible four stroke. All I have seen/heard are vauge rumors.
 
S_Happens said:
Certainly not true of two strokes.

As for four strokes, although mostly a good point, this could be remedied by direct injection or valvetrain actuation that is not mechanically linked to the crankshaft.

To concede, I have never seen any evidence of a reversible four stroke. All I have seen/heard are vauge rumors.

What the hell are you talking about? The very process of combustion is irreversible. You cannot create fuel - air mixtures by compressing smoke.
 
Nothing in my posts is strictly prohibitive of combustion. In fact I explicitly state what would have to be done in order to reverse the rotation of a 4 stroke and still achieve combustion (nothing specific prohibits reverse operation in a 2 stroke for short duractions). I never even come close to pretending to combust spent air/fuel.

To be blunt, why do you think that if valvetrain actuation is independent of crankshaft rotation you would be "compressing smoke"? I think you are confusing reversing the rotation of the crankshaft/rotating assembly with completely reversing the fuel/air/exhaust flow through the entire engine.

You seem to ignore 2 stroke engines. There are many cases of 2 stroke engines being reversed (almost exclusively in very short durations). In most cases this is used in lieu of a reverse gear.
 
For clarity, I think the crux of the problem is that your example is to take a conventional four stroke engine and try to run it backwards without any modification. I am talking about what it would take to reverse the crankshaft rotation in a four stroke engine and still achieve combustion. The valvetrain actuation would have to be reversed as well (meaning it would need to function in the same order it did before reversing crankshaft rotation), which I have mentioned in every post of mine so far. This is exactly what the rumored engines do.
 
Why don't you use a gearbox like any normal person would do then? Also, this is not what I meant by reversible heat engine.
 
I appreciate the responses.
 
  • #10
Dickfore said:
Why don't you use a gearbox like any normal person would do then? Also, this is not what I meant by reversible heat engine.

When you only need to run at a set speed in either direction a reversible two stroke is more suited to the task as you don't have the losses associated with a transmission.

S_Happens also made the clear distinction that he was not talking about thermodynamically reversible systems.
 
  • #11
First time I saw a two stroke run backwards was when my buddy momentarily popped the clutch on his dirt bike, while rolling it (backwards) down the ramp off his pickup... I will never forget the look on his face when he then revved the motor and let the clutch out ...

Though I suspect the OP here is talking about reversible in the thermo sense
 
  • #12
I'm not sure what the official engineering take on this is, but I can say from experience that you can make a 4-stroke run backwards by using a reversed-grind cam and bass-ackwards starter. (It might be a tad more complicated now; that was when the distributor was driven from the camshaft.) You would then, of course, have to also build a custom bell-housing so you could flip your tranny upside-down. Elsewise, you would have 4 reverse gears and one forward.
 
  • #13
Danger said:
I'm not sure what the official engineering take on this is, but I can say from experience that you can make a 4-stroke run backwards by using a reversed-grind cam and bass-ackwards starter. (It might be a tad more complicated now; that was when the distributor was driven from the camshaft.) You would then, of course, have to also build a custom bell-housing so you could flip your tranny upside-down. Elsewise, you would have 4 reverse gears and one forward.

That would do the trick, a mirrored cam was what I used to get a straight 4 to run backwards as one bank of a V8. Spark timing is the easy bit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
233
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K