Revolving around a sphere helically?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ManDay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of an entity revolving helically around a sphere while maintaining equal distance from its surface, constrained only by a perpendicular force. Participants clarify that, according to Newton's second law, a radial force cannot induce a helical path on a spherical surface, as it would only result in motion along a great circle. The conversation also touches on the concept of special topologies, suggesting that while helical orbits are possible around an infinitely long cylinder, finite cylinders will distort these orbits near their endpoints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Basic knowledge of spherical geometry
  • Familiarity with concepts of topology
  • Insight into orbital mechanics around cylindrical structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Newton's second law in non-Euclidean geometries
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of spherical geometry
  • Study the properties of helical orbits in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the effects of finite versus infinite mass distributions on orbital paths
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students interested in advanced mechanics, topology, and the mathematical modeling of orbital dynamics.

ManDay
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
Dumb question maybe, since I'm not a mathematician, but is there something like a specific kind of space in which an entity given a certain initial velocity parallel to the surface of a sphere and constrained to equal distance to the surface of it will revolve arround the square helically (not equatorially), without being exerted any force other than the one running perpendicular to the surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ManDay said:
Dumb question maybe, since I'm not a mathematician, but is there something like a specific kind of space in which an entity given a certain initial velocity parallel to the surface of a sphere and constrained to equal distance to the surface of it will revolve arround the square helically (not equatorially), without being exerted any force other than the one running perpendicular to the surface?

Hi ManDay! :smile:

(btw, "helically" means like a spring … did you mean like a sort-of sine function?)

If the only force is radial, then good ol' Newton's second law means that the particle will have no reason to turn, and so will move along a great circle ("an equator").

The radial force may change the speed along that great circle, but can't make it deviate from the great circle. :smile:
 
Like a spring, yes.

Since this is the physics-forum I assume you can assume that everyone can presume at least a basic knowledge. Know about that "Newton-stuff" :D I'm concerning the mathematical aspects since this is the maths-subsection. I was asking for a sort of special topology or reference-space in this would be possible.
 
Last edited:
ManDay said:
Like a spring, yes.

Mathematically, you can't have a spring on the surface of a sphere, or "constrained to equal distance to the surface".
I was asking for a sort of special topology or reference-space in this would be possible.

Changing the coordinates won't alter this basic reality. :redface:
 
If you hand an infinitely-long cylinder of matter as the source of the force, then there would be helical orbits around it.

Consequently, for a finite cylinder, if it is sufficiently long and dense, and you stay near the center (away from the endpoints), then there are orbits which locally look like helices. But since the cylinder is finite, these orbits will distort as they get closer to the endpoints.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K