Rewriting the propagator for the free particle as integral over E

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on rewriting the propagator for a free particle, represented as U(t) = ∫_{-\infty}^{\infty} |p> PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically free particle propagators.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and the relationship between momentum and energy.
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and variable substitution techniques.
  • Basic concepts of degenerate energy eigenstates in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the propagator in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of energy eigenvalue degeneracy in quantum systems.
  • Research variable change techniques in integrals, particularly in quantum contexts.
  • Explore the relationship between momentum and energy in free particle systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on propagators, energy eigenstates, and the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(This is all with respect to a free particle)
Show that the propagator U(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |p><p| exp\left(\frac{-i E(p) t}{\hbar}\right) dp can be rewritten as an integral over E and sum over the \pm index as:

U(t) = \sum_{\alpha = \pm} \int_{0}^{\infty} \left(\frac{m}{\sqrt{2mE}}\right) |E, \alpha><E, \alpha| exp\left(\frac{-i E t}{\hbar}\right) dE.

Homework Equations



The Hamiltonian for a free particle is just H = P^2/2m (all kinetic energy) and the allowed values of momentum are plus or minus 2mE. So, for a given energy eigenvalue, there is a degenerate 2 dimensional subspace.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well... I can see that when we change to sum over E instead of P (or rather, integrate) that we have to change the limit of integration from 0 to infinity because the energy cannot be negative for a free particle. Also, it makes fine sense to me to sum over alpha because we're dealing with a degenerate subspace. What I can't figure out is the constant in front! Can someone help point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
could the constant come from the intgeration variable change?

ie what is dE in terms of dp?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K