Right Hand Rule in NMR and EPR?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Right Hand Rule in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR), emphasizing the importance of field alignment. The main magnetic field typically ranges from 1.5 T to 3.0 T, while the RF field is between 5 µT and 20 µT. It is established that the RF coil can be aligned with the main magnetic field, but this configuration is not preferred by MRI manufacturers due to excitation limitations. The oscillating perturbation must rotate in the x-y plane, and circularly polarized photons are necessary to impart spin, confirming that directionality is crucial for effective resonance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NMR and EPR principles
  • Familiarity with magnetic field strengths (1.5 T to 3.0 T for NMR)
  • Knowledge of RF field characteristics (5 µT to 20 µT)
  • Basic quantum mechanics, particularly regarding spin states
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and function of RF coils in NMR systems
  • Learn about the implications of field alignment in EPR experiments
  • Study the role of circular polarization in quantum spin excitation
  • Explore historical advancements in NMR technology from the late 1940s
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, particularly those focusing on the technical aspects of RF coil design and field alignment in NMR and EPR applications.

Narayanan KR
Messages
76
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I noticed that in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and in Electron Spin Resonance (a.k.a Electron Paramagnetic Resonance) the B Field of Excitation Signal (Radio wave in case of NMR, Microwave in case of EPR) is kept Orthogonal (perpendicular) to Main Magnetic Field, also the output in NMR is an oscillating B field Orthogonal to both the main Field and excitation field, Does it always has to be like this (like in Flemming's Right Hand Rule) or can the angles differ ?
pf-3-11-2021.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main magnetic field is typically in the 1.5 T to 3.0 T range. The RF field is in the 5 uT to 20 uT range. The RF field may accidentally have a small component in the longitudinal direction, but because it is so small compared to the main magnetic field it is completely negligible. It produces an undetectable difference in the main magnetic field. It is only the transverse component that can be distinguished from the main field. It is still minuscule compared to the main field, but since it points in a different direction it is detectable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR
Dale said:
The main magnetic field is typically in the 1.5 T to 3.0 T range. The RF field is in the 5 uT to 20 uT range. The RF field may accidentally have a small component in the longitudinal direction, but because it is so small compared to the main magnetic field it is completely negligible. It produces an undetectable difference in the main magnetic field. It is only the transverse component that can be distinguished from the main field. It is still minuscule compared to the main field, but since it points in a different direction it is detectable.
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
 
Narayanan KR said:
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
Sure. But no MRI manufacturer wants to do that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR
Narayanan KR said:
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
No. The homogeneous static field (z-axis) causes the degenerate spin states to split according to ##m_s## along that axis. The oscillating perturbation B field must rotate in the x-y plane. In quantum language the photons must be circularly polarized to impart the required spin.
This is in many books and wikipedia
 
Indeed, the direction matters
Note however that this does not mean that you can't get away with having components in other directions. EPR is done using microwave cavities/resonators and whereas you typically should do your best to align all the field directions so that it is "by the book" the real-world field distribution can be quite complicated. It will still work as long as you have some components in the "right" direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen and hutchphd
hutchphd said:
No. The homogeneous static field (z-axis) causes the degenerate spin states to split according to ms along that axis. The oscillating perturbation B field must rotate in the x-y plane. In quantum language the photons must be circularly polarized to impart the required spin.
Just to head off potential confusion for the OP due to conflicting answers. I was answering the question “if the static field is in the z direction is it physically possible to make an RF coil that also points in the z direction?” To which the answer is “yes” as I said. You answered the question “could such a RF coil excite the spins?” To which the answer is “no” as you said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR and gentzen
@Dale thanks for the clarification. For @Narayanan KR (the OP): in fact, in most older NMR machines there is a small coil coaxial to the main static magnet that is driven with a sawtooth or triangular current at very modest frequency. This is used to slightly sweep the value of the resonant frequency which is electronically simpler than changing the frequency of the excitation field. In the late 1940's it was the only way to do it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR, WernerQH and gentzen
Dale said:
Just to head off potential confusion for the OP due to conflicting answers. I was answering the question “if the static field is in the z direction is it physically possible to make an RF coil that also points in the z direction?” To which the answer is “yes” as I said. You answered the question “could such a RF coil excite the spins?” To which the answer is “no” as you said.
thanks for clarification...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
716
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K