Right Hand Rule in NMR and EPR?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the right-hand rule in the context of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR). Participants explore the orientation of magnetic fields, particularly the relationship between the main magnetic field and the radio frequency (RF) field, and the implications for spin excitation in these systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the main magnetic field typically ranges from 1.5 T to 3.0 T, while the RF field is much weaker, in the range of 5 uT to 20 uT.
  • It is suggested that the RF field may have a negligible longitudinal component, with the transverse component being the only detectable part.
  • One participant proposes that the RF coil can be wound around the magnets such that their fields align along the same axis, but others challenge this idea.
  • Another participant argues that the RF field must rotate in the x-y plane to effectively excite spins, as the static field causes spin state splitting along the z-axis.
  • Some participants acknowledge that while aligning fields "by the book" is ideal, real-world applications can tolerate some misalignment as long as components are in the "right" direction.
  • A clarification is made regarding the physical possibility of having an RF coil aligned with the static field, stating that while it is possible, it would not effectively excite the spins.
  • Historical context is provided about older NMR machines using a coaxial coil to adjust resonant frequency, indicating practical considerations in design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the alignment of the RF coil with the static magnetic field, with some asserting it is possible but ineffective for excitation, while others emphasize the necessity of specific orientations for proper function. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal configuration for RF coils in relation to static fields.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the effectiveness of RF coils aligned with the static field and the implications of field misalignment in practical applications.

Narayanan KR
Messages
76
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I noticed that in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and in Electron Spin Resonance (a.k.a Electron Paramagnetic Resonance) the B Field of Excitation Signal (Radio wave in case of NMR, Microwave in case of EPR) is kept Orthogonal (perpendicular) to Main Magnetic Field, also the output in NMR is an oscillating B field Orthogonal to both the main Field and excitation field, Does it always has to be like this (like in Flemming's Right Hand Rule) or can the angles differ ?
pf-3-11-2021.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main magnetic field is typically in the 1.5 T to 3.0 T range. The RF field is in the 5 uT to 20 uT range. The RF field may accidentally have a small component in the longitudinal direction, but because it is so small compared to the main magnetic field it is completely negligible. It produces an undetectable difference in the main magnetic field. It is only the transverse component that can be distinguished from the main field. It is still minuscule compared to the main field, but since it points in a different direction it is detectable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR
Dale said:
The main magnetic field is typically in the 1.5 T to 3.0 T range. The RF field is in the 5 uT to 20 uT range. The RF field may accidentally have a small component in the longitudinal direction, but because it is so small compared to the main magnetic field it is completely negligible. It produces an undetectable difference in the main magnetic field. It is only the transverse component that can be distinguished from the main field. It is still minuscule compared to the main field, but since it points in a different direction it is detectable.
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
 
Narayanan KR said:
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
Sure. But no MRI manufacturer wants to do that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR
Narayanan KR said:
so we can have the RF coil wound around the magnets, such that their fields are along same axis right ?
No. The homogeneous static field (z-axis) causes the degenerate spin states to split according to ##m_s## along that axis. The oscillating perturbation B field must rotate in the x-y plane. In quantum language the photons must be circularly polarized to impart the required spin.
This is in many books and wikipedia
 
Indeed, the direction matters
Note however that this does not mean that you can't get away with having components in other directions. EPR is done using microwave cavities/resonators and whereas you typically should do your best to align all the field directions so that it is "by the book" the real-world field distribution can be quite complicated. It will still work as long as you have some components in the "right" direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen and hutchphd
hutchphd said:
No. The homogeneous static field (z-axis) causes the degenerate spin states to split according to ms along that axis. The oscillating perturbation B field must rotate in the x-y plane. In quantum language the photons must be circularly polarized to impart the required spin.
Just to head off potential confusion for the OP due to conflicting answers. I was answering the question “if the static field is in the z direction is it physically possible to make an RF coil that also points in the z direction?” To which the answer is “yes” as I said. You answered the question “could such a RF coil excite the spins?” To which the answer is “no” as you said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR and gentzen
@Dale thanks for the clarification. For @Narayanan KR (the OP): in fact, in most older NMR machines there is a small coil coaxial to the main static magnet that is driven with a sawtooth or triangular current at very modest frequency. This is used to slightly sweep the value of the resonant frequency which is electronically simpler than changing the frequency of the excitation field. In the late 1940's it was the only way to do it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Narayanan KR, WernerQH and gentzen
Dale said:
Just to head off potential confusion for the OP due to conflicting answers. I was answering the question “if the static field is in the z direction is it physically possible to make an RF coil that also points in the z direction?” To which the answer is “yes” as I said. You answered the question “could such a RF coil excite the spins?” To which the answer is “no” as you said.
thanks for clarification...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
859
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K