Rigid Body Dynamics: Calculating Force on Beam Supports

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rigid beam supported at both ends with a student standing on it, requiring the calculation of the upward forces exerted by the supports. The context is rigid body dynamics, specifically focusing on forces and torques in static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of force and torque equations to find the normal forces on the beam. There are attempts to set up equations based on net forces and moments about the supports. Some participants express confusion about the correct setup of the equations and the definitions of variables.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between forces and torques. Some participants have provided equations and insights into how to approach the problem, while others are still seeking clarification on specific aspects of the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of including both the weight of the beam and the student in the calculations. There is also mention of the need to consider the direction of forces and torques in the equations.

aligass2004
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.0 m long rigid beam with a mass of 130 kg is supported at each end. A 65 kg student stands 2.0 m from support 1. How much upward force does each support exert on the beam?

http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff4/alg5045/p13-56.gif


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried doing Fnet = N1 - W - N2 = 0, but that didn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have to determine total upward force on the beam (N1+N2) than you have to equate net force on the beam = 0. In the equation written, you have missed out one of the weights out of the weight of the man and weight of the beam (unless W represents sum of the two weights). However, if you need N1 and N2 separately, then take moments of the forces about two supports and then solve for N1 and N2.
 
I was using a similar example in the book, which said that Fnet = n1 - w - n2 = 0. Then it said that n2 = d1w/(d1 + d2). I tried 1m ((130+65)9.8)/1+2, but that was wrong.
 
The normal forces act upward...

so N1 + N2 - w = 0

now take the torque about any point of your choosing... set the torque = 0... that gives a second equation. choosing the right point can make the math a little easier...

2 equations, 2 unknowns N1 and N2... you can solve for both.
 
I still don't understand.
 
aligass2004 said:
I still don't understand.

What is the torque about the left support in terms of the forces and distances...?
 
T = rF, and the F is N1 = d2w/(d1+d2)?
 
aligass2004 said:
T = rF, and the F is N1 = d2w/(d1+d2)?

How did you get the N1 = d2w/(d1+d2)? I don't know if that's right or not...

N1 exerts no torque about the left support... because the distance from the support is 0.

start with the basics.

Torque about the left support = w*2 - N2*3 (taking clockwise positive counterclockwise negative).

do you see how I got this?

set this equal to zero:

0 = w*2 - N2*3

you also have the equation

0 = N1 + N2 - w (sum of forces in the y-direction must be 0)

solve these 2 equations to get N1 and N2.
 
I think I see how you got the equation. Is the weight (mass of beam + mass of student)g?
 
  • #10
aligass2004 said:
I think I see how you got the equation. Is the weight (mass of beam + mass of student)g?

oh... I forgot the beam... I was using w for the student...

torque = (rod's mass)*g*1.5 + (student's mass)*g*2 - N2*3

0 = (rod's mass)*g*1.5 + (student's mass)*g*2 - N2*3
 
  • #11
For N2 I got 1061.667. To find N1 I know I use 0 = N1 + N2 - w, but what is w? Is it the same as above?
 
  • #12
aligass2004 said:
For N2 I got 1061.667. To find N1 I know I use 0 = N1 + N2 - w, but what is w? Is it the same as above?

I messed that up too just like the moment equation... I forgot the weight of the student... but you can fix the equation... we need the sum of the forces in the vertical direction... take up as positive down as negative...

what equation do you get?
 
  • #13
The sum of the forces in the vertical direction would include the two normal forces, but I'm unsure about how to factor in the weight. I imagine torque is going to be involved.
 
  • #14
aligass2004 said:
The sum of the forces in the vertical direction would include the two normal forces, but I'm unsure about how to factor in the weight. I imagine torque is going to be involved.

No torque is only for the torque equation...

Just simply add up the forces taking up as positive, down as negative... no tricks.
 
  • #15
If there are no tricks, then F = N1 + N2 - (mass of the beam + mass of the student)g.
 
  • #16
aligass2004 said:
If there are no tricks, then F = N1 + N2 - (mass of the beam + mass of the student)g.

yes, exactly... this has to add to zero.

N1 + N2 - (mass of the beam + mass of the student)g = 0.

In all these statics (no moving parts) problems... you'll generally use 3 equations.

[tex]\Sigma F_x = 0[/tex] (sum of forces in the x-direction = 0)
[tex]\Sigma F_y = 0[/tex] (sum of forces in the y-direction = 0)

and

net torque about any point = 0. (you are free to choose any point).
 
  • #17
Awesome. See, I can do the forces part...just not the torque.
 
  • #18
aligass2004 said:
Awesome. See, I can do the forces part...just not the torque.

think force*distance, and clockwise/counterclockwise... you'll get used to it. Did you solve both N1 and N2?
 
  • #19
Yep, N2 = 1061.667 and N1 = 849.333
 
  • #20
aligass2004 said:
Yep, N2 = 1061.667 and N1 = 849.333

cool. that's what I get.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K