Undergrad Rindler Transformation & 't Hooft's Introduction to General Relativity

Click For Summary
't Hooft's introduction to general relativity includes a derivation of the Rindler transformation, which prompts questions about the formula $$\rho^{-2}g(\zeta)$$ and its implications. The discussion highlights concerns over the use of the "it" convention in the 2010 text. The method for determining acceleration involves analyzing the four-acceleration of an observer in Rindler coordinates, with potential shortcuts available. Additionally, the relationship between time dilation and gravitational potential is questioned, particularly regarding its gradient and implications for gravitational acceleration. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities and nuances in understanding these concepts in general relativity.
wnvl2
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
I am reading 't Hooft introduction to general relativity.

https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~hooft10 ... l_2010.pdf

In this text 't Hoof derives the Rindler transformation.

Image1.png


A little bit further he writes

Image2.png


My question is, how does he come to that formula $$\rho^{-2}g(\zeta)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gentle shudder at the use of ##it## convention. Did he really do that in 2010? Ugh.

The general way of getting the acceleration is to take the modulus of the four-acceleration of the observer who is stationary in Rindler coordinates. There are possible shortcuts in this case, though. Has he established a relationship between time dilation and gravitational potential? If so you can take its gradient to get the acceleration due to "gravity".
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K