RNA destroyed, and areas of no color showed!

  • Thread starter UnD3R0aTh
  • Start date
  • #1
90
0
1. The problem in attachments



Homework Equations





3. RNA destroyed means no proteins (enzymes) formed, however if some areas showed no color, does that mean other areas did? i'm pretty sure the answer is D but making sure
 

Attachments

  • transcripts.PNG
    transcripts.PNG
    31.8 KB · Views: 470

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,427
3,910
I would probably go with D as well. The only other option that would make sense is C, but a reduction in level of the enzyme would probably produce a fainter color (e.g. pink color) rather than no color.
 
  • #3
90
0
I would probably go with D as well. The only other option that would make sense is C, but a reduction in level of the enzyme would probably produce a fainter color (e.g. pink color) rather than no color.

reduction in the enzyme will produce fainter color? or areas with no color? it might be c because there are areas with color! this is a tricky one! the problem is rna is at the cellular level, the color is at a multicellular level, it's a bit unclear to me plz more advice!
 
  • #4
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,427
3,910
It's hard to distinguish between C and D without more information.
 
  • #5
chemisttree
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,617
638
If a transcript is supressed, wouldn't it fail to produce the enzyme (so B is the answer)?
 
  • #6
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,427
3,910
To me, B (a key enzyme involved in flower pigmentation was inactivated) suggests that the enzyme is still produced but it's activity gets inhibited (for example by a small molecule that blocks the active site), especially given the presence of answer D (a key enzyme involved in flower pigmentation was not produced).
 
  • #7
epenguin
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,873
897
attachment.php?attachmentid=61078&d=1377235200.png


The information in the question is pretty insufficient - it might make sense within your course and what you have been told, or the preceding questions, which we do not know.

My best guess for what the first question could mean(!) would be "The flower colour can be influenced by external conditions (temperature, nutrients, minerals or something). The mechanism of this influence has been shown to be that the influencing factor somehow causes degradation of transcripts of a particular gene." I have to presume that it is meant that the effect is not seen until the second generation, and that the treatment with the factor continues then.

What then is described sounds like what is known as mosaicsm. When a character depends on transcripts expressed in early development, if transcription is interfered with, the transcripts can be present in some cells and not others, making a "mosaic" of cells in the organism, example IIRC tortoiseshell cats.

On the face of it I would say it has to be C not D, because some of the plant is red. But maybe D is just possible, through cytoplasmic carry-over of transcripts. I have never heard of such phenomenon, but that is not a strong argument, and if it is thinkable it probably happens somewhere.

I would say C and the others not, because (cheating) there is nothing in the premisses to implicate them. I suspect it would be clearer if we had questions 1 and 2.
 

Related Threads on RNA destroyed, and areas of no color showed!

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
355
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
11K
Top