Roadmap for learning String Theory?

Click For Summary
To gain a reasonable understanding of string theory, starting with "A First Course in String Theory" by Zwiebach is recommended, though it may focus heavily on classical physics. A solid grasp of quantum mechanics, as covered in Shankar's book, is beneficial, but familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT) and general relativity (GR) is also crucial for deeper insights, especially regarding concepts like holographic duality. For QFT, "QFT in a Nutshell" by Zee is suggested as a valuable resource. While a basic understanding of string theory can be achieved without delving into advanced topics like supersymmetry, engaging with both QFT and GR will enhance comprehension significantly. Overall, a combination of these resources will provide a well-rounded foundation in string theory.
patrik1982
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
One of my goals in life is to get a reasonable understanding of string theory. This is done as a hobby of mine so I will not have a professor to ask.

My question is: which route would you recommend for learning this?

My thoughts:

I understand many people think highly of "A First Course in String Theory" by Zwiebach so this is probably the path I will take - unless you guys would recommend another path.
But I cannot find any info on the prerequisites for this book.

I have an understanding of quantum mechanics at the level of Shankar (up to, and including, the chapter on addition of angular momentum).
Is this enough or do I need to learn the rest of that book?

Do I need QFT? If so - what is a good book for me?

Do I need GR? I do have the books by Carroll and Schutz but I haven't read them yet. Do I have to? (I do have a firm understanding of SR)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi patrik1982,

Welcome to PF!

I would say it depends on your detailed goals. Zwiebach is, in my opininon, a very fun book, but it spends a lot of time on classical physics. If for you a "reasonable understanding" includes the ability to do some calculations in the quantum theory, then zwiebach may move a bit slowly. However, I would heartily recommend the earlier chapters regardless of your goals, and I think its a good book to look back to later on for a simpler conceptual take.

In my experience, QFT and GR are what most string theorists do on a daily basis. But again, it depends on what you really want to achieve. To have some flavor of holographic duality, for example, you will need some of both QFT and GR. I really don't know how much of a real picture one can have, beyond some inspired metaphors, for holographic duality without knowing a bit of QFT and GR. On the other hand, one can actually understand much of the basic physics without more technical things like supersymmetry.

A reasonable conceptual picture could be built from studying Zee's QFT in a nutshell and Zwiebach's string theory. Perhaps the most important thing is that Zee teaches you to think about QFT in the correct "wilsonian" way. These two might be a bit of stretch from where you are now, but I'm sure you would enjoy it.

With some feedback from you about your expectations, I'm sure we could narrow things down even more.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K