Robertson-Walker Models Conformally Flat

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Models
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 3K views
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
As an understanding exercise in my general relativity course my professor recommended proving to ourselves that all Robertson-Walker models are conformally flat. However, I am unsure of how to approach such a proof. Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By homogeneity, tidal forces vanish, i.e., the Weyl tensor is zero. Since the Weyl tensor is zero, the spacetime is conformally flat.
 
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.

Yep, thanks for the correction.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.

I don't get this. If the expansion rates are anisotropic then it would seem that the space could only be homogeneous at a particular moment in time. From that point becoming inhomogeneous from then on.
?
 
Each hypersurface t = const in the spacetime is a flat 3-space, hence it is always homogeneous. But the expansion rate is different in different directions. This is an example of a Bianchi cosmology, of which there are nine types, each with a different symmetry. See for example Ken Jacobs' thesis.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.
I'm doubtful that a non-isotropic cosmology can be made flat thru a conformal transformation. How do you preserve the angles when going from anisotropy to
isotropy?

Edit:oops, I realize this seems to be precisely your point.
 
Last edited: