Big Crunch in Robertson-Walker Models

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Models
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of a negative cosmological constant within Robertson-Walker models, specifically regarding the potential for a "big crunch" scenario. It is established that if the cosmological constant is negative, the universe will indeed experience a big crunch at a finite future time, leading to the scale factor a(t) reaching zero. Participants emphasize the importance of analyzing the Friedmann equations to understand the stability and evolution of the universe's expansion or contraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Robertson-Walker models
  • Familiarity with Friedmann equations
  • Knowledge of cosmological constants
  • Concept of scale factors in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative cosmological constants in cosmological models
  • Study the stability criteria for solutions of the Friedmann equations
  • Explore the Milne universe and its unique properties
  • Investigate the mathematical behavior of scale factors in dynamic cosmological scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and contraction, particularly those studying the implications of cosmological constants in theoretical models.

Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
If we were to assume that in a Robertson-Walker model that the cosmological constant was less than zero, would this imply that at a finite time in the future the universe would undergo a "big crunch"? More importantly, would this imply the scale factor a(t) is equal to zero at that time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried looking at the behavior of the terms in the Friedmann equations and reasoning about how they would evolve?

The easiest thing to start by doing would be to check whether there is any equilibrium (stable or unstable).

Airsteve0 said:
[...]would this imply that at a finite time in the future the universe would undergo a "big crunch"? More importantly, would this imply the scale factor a(t) is equal to zero at that time?

Why do you say "more importantly?" I think these two things are synonymous, except in the special case of the Milne universe, where the scaling is just a change of coordinates.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Questioning the timescape model
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Graduate Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Graduate Cosmological Density Perturbation vs Homogeneity: Questions Answered
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Graduate Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Time Before Big Bang: Relational Dynamics & Singularities
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Electrodynamics in Robertson Walker spacetime
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Undergrad What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Graduate Missing step in the derivation of the Robertson-Walker metric
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Graduate Uncertainties in the proof of Proposition 4.4.2 in Hawking and Ellis
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Big bang in Robertson - Walker space - time
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K