Robertson-Walker Models Conformally Flat

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Models
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
As an understanding exercise in my general relativity course my professor recommended proving to ourselves that all Robertson-Walker models are conformally flat. However, I am unsure of how to approach such a proof. Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.

Yep, thanks for the correction.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.

I don't get this. If the expansion rates are anisotropic then it would seem that the space could only be homogeneous at a particular moment in time. From that point becoming inhomogeneous from then on.
?
 
Each hypersurface t = const in the spacetime is a flat 3-space, hence it is always homogeneous. But the expansion rate is different in different directions. This is an example of a Bianchi cosmology, of which there are nine types, each with a different symmetry. See for example Ken Jacobs' thesis.
 
Bill_K said:
Is it homogeneity or isotropy? The Robertson-Walker metric is both. But you can have a cosmology with different expansion rates in different directions:

ds2 = dt2 - a(t)dx2 - b(t)dy2 - c(t)dz2

which is homogeneous but not isotropic. I'd guess the Weyl tensor for this type of cosmology is nonzero.
I'm doubtful that a non-isotropic cosmology can be made flat thru a conformal transformation. How do you preserve the angles when going from anisotropy to
isotropy?

Edit:oops, I realize this seems to be precisely your point.
 
Last edited: