Rock climbing with forces along a "cam clamp" axle

  • Thread starter Thread starter aspodkfpo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axle Forces Rock
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 1K views
aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Why is the downward force Ff all on the axle of the cam is converted (through the cam’s rigidity) to an outward force Fr on the rock, which acts along the line from the axle of the cam to the point of contact with the rock and how are you able to relate cos Ff and N to those angles on the cam?
Relevant Equations
Ffall = 2Fr sinφ
N = Fr cosφ
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Physics_ASOE2015solutions.pdf
Q`12b)
Unable to understand how they deduct the relation between Ffall and N via the angles.
Unable to tell why this would act along the axle of the cam to the point of contact with the rod and be relatable to each other via the angle?

The model that I have in my head is that the gravitational force equals to the frictional force and there is a normal force, and that the gravitational force and the normal force do not relate to each other like this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aspodkfpo said:
Why is the downward force Ff all on the axle of the cam is converted (through the cam’s rigidity) to an outward force Fr on the rock, which acts along the line from the axle of the cam to the point of contact with the rock and how are you able to relate cos Ff and N to those angles on the cam?
Can you attempt to draw the FBD for one lobe of the cam and post it?
 
haruspex said:
Can you attempt to draw the FBD for one lobe of the cam and post it?
1597899179629.png

Specifically I don't see why Fn + Fg would equal a force that just happens to be at phi angle to the vertical. (this image should be rotated 90 degrees for the actual model)
 

Attachments

  • 1597899075518.png
    1597899075518.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 212
aspodkfpo said:
View attachment 268016
Specifically I don't see why Fn + Fg would equal a force that just happens to be at phi angle to the vertical. (this image should be rotated 90 degrees for the actual model)
##F_g## should act at the pivot, and there should be another force at the pivot from the other lobe.
##F_f## should act at the rock surface.
Your ##F_N## arrow wanders around a bit. It should be normal to the rock surface, not passing through the angle on the other side of the cam.
 
haruspex said:
##F_g## should act at the pivot, and there should be another force at the pivot from the other lobe.
##F_f## should act at the rock surface.
Your ##F_N## arrow wanders around a bit. It should be normal to the rock surface, not passing through the angle on the other side of the cam.
Statement 1 and 2, we're taught to draw fbd from the centre of mass in schools now LOL.
Statement 3 and 4, can't draw something without the wobbles with a mouse, it's meant to be normal.
Still don't see why Fn + Fg would equal a force that just happens to be at phi angle to the vertical.
 
aspodkfpo said:
we're taught to draw fbd from the centre of mass in schools now
Then how do you figure out torque balance?
aspodkfpo said:
don't see why Fn + Fg would equal a force that just happens to be at phi angle to the vertical.
Because if not then torques would not balance and the cam would rotate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aspodkfpo