Roger Penrose's Crazy Idea on the Big Bang

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dm4b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea Penrose
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Roger Penrose's ideas regarding the Big Bang and the nature of the universe's expansion, particularly focusing on a cyclical model of the universe. Participants explore concepts related to the accelerating universe, the role of massless particles, and the implications of time and space in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant summarizes Penrose's idea that as the universe expands, all matter will eventually be trapped by black holes, which will then evaporate, leaving only radiation and massless particles that do not experience time.
  • It is proposed that without matter to experience time, time itself would cease to exist, leading to the assertion that without time, there would be no space.
  • Another participant mentions Penrose's cyclical model, suggesting that the universe could undergo a transformation from an infinite expanse to an infinitesimal point, leading to another Big Bang.
  • A participant references Penrose's published work, "Cycles of Time," and a co-authored paper that claims to find evidence supporting his theory, although this evidence has been challenged by others as a statistical artifact.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of Penrose's ideas on the conservation of matter-energy and how this relates to the universe's end-state being all energy together in a dimensionless point.
  • One participant challenges the claim that all matter will eventually fall into black holes, indicating a disagreement on this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of Penrose's ideas, with some agreeing on the cyclical nature of the universe while others challenge specific claims, such as the fate of all matter. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of Penrose's logic regarding the relationship between time and space, as well as the implications of massless particles in the context of the universe's end-state.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in cosmology, theoretical physics, and the philosophical implications of time and space may find this discussion relevant.

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
I was watching a show recently where Roger Penrose explained a new idea he had on the Big Bang. It was very interesting, and I thought I was recording it. Of course, it didn't, now I can't remember exactly what he said, and of course, can't find it anywhere else. Perhaps somebody can feel in the details for me?

His idea was basically cenerted around the accelerating Universe and that it would keep on expanding. It also hinged around the idea that photons, or any massless particle really, does not experience the passage of time.

He went on to say that as the Universe expanded, eventually all matter would be trapped by a Black Hole and the Black holes would evaporate way. Eventually, there would be nothing left in the Universe but cold, cold, radiation, or massless particles that cannot sense the passage of time.

With nothing left in the Universe to experience time (i.e. matter), time itself would cease to exist.

Now, assuming I'm not already totally twisting his ideas around, here is where my memory gets fuzzy.

He then went on to say that without time, there would somehow not be space. I missed his logic entirely on this point. But, to continue, this big empty Universe we would picture at this point, somehow is gone. The infinite expanse of space becomes the infintesimal. And, then you have another Big Bang ... somehow.

So, it's a cyclical model, really.

Does anybody know more about this idea/theory of Penrose, and maybe know where I can go to find out more?

Thanks!
dm4b
 
Space news on Phys.org
He's published a popular-level book on it, called Cycles of Time. He recently co-authored a paper with an obervationalist claiming to find evidence in the cosmic microwave background to support his theory, but then others reanalyzed the data and found that what they'd seen was a statistical artifact.
 
Thanks bcrowell. That'll help a bunch for me to find out more.
 
dm4b said:
I was watching a show recently where Roger Penrose explained a new idea he had on the Big Bang. It was very interesting, and I thought I was recording it. Of course, it didn't, now I can't remember exactly what he said, and of course, can't find it anywhere else. Perhaps somebody can feel in the details for me?

His idea was basically cenerted around the accelerating Universe and that it would keep on expanding. It also hinged around the idea that photons, or any massless particle really, does not experience the passage of time.

He went on to say that as the Universe expanded, eventually all matter would be trapped by a Black Hole and the Black holes would evaporate way. Eventually, there would be nothing left in the Universe but cold, cold, radiation, or massless particles that cannot sense the passage of time.

With nothing left in the Universe to experience time (i.e. matter), time itself would cease to exist.

Now, assuming I'm not already totally twisting his ideas around, here is where my memory gets fuzzy.

He then went on to say that without time, there would somehow not be space. I missed his logic entirely on this point. But, to continue, this big empty Universe we would picture at this point, somehow is gone. The infinite expanse of space becomes the infintesimal. And, then you have another Big Bang ... somehow.

So, it's a cyclical model, really.

Does anybody know more about this idea/theory of Penrose, and maybe know where I can go to find out more?

Thanks!
dm4b

What is the exact title of the show? Discovery Channel? I'd try to find it.
 
Hi rogerl, I wish I could remember. I have Tivo, so I tried searching for it, to see if I could remember the name, so I could try and record it again, but no luck :(

All I remember is the whole show was ideas about the Big Bang, and about what could have possibly have come "before" it. Penrose was just one of the guys that presented his idea.
 
There was a BBC horizon documentary called "What Happened Befopre the Big Bang" put that into youtube search and you'll find it. A very good documentary with brief explanations of LGC's big bounce, Ekpyrosis, eternal inflation etc from some big names in cosmology: Linde, Singh, Turok, Smolin, Penrose etc . Sometimes US channels will rescreen Uk docs as their own and vice versa witha change of narrator. I wodner if this si the case here.
As I undersatnd Penrsoe idea known as CCC is that if everything decays into radiation then everyhting is traveling at C. If that's the case then length contraction causes the size of the universe to undergo a rescaling. It effectively has zero size which is equivalent to the beginning of the universe, so the end and the beginning are the same thing and the universe is cyclic.
 
I think it was that Horizon: I was watching too.

So is the idea that... because of matter-energy equivalence and the conservation of matter-energy, Penrose's end-state of the universe is effectively all energy (matter-energy decayed to radiation) together in a dimensionless point?
 
yeah thanks skydivephil - I'm prettty sure that's the one! I'll have to see if I can't get it recorded.
 
I'd just like to point out that all matter will not eventually fall into black holes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K