What Determines the Speed of a Roller Coaster on an Inclined Plane?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a roller coaster descending an inclined plane. The original poster presents a scenario where the roller coaster starts at a speed of 6.0 km/h at the top of a hill and descends a 45-degree incline that is 45 meters long, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.12. The poster questions whether the mass of the roller cart is necessary to determine its speed at the bottom of the hill.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of mass in the problem, with some suggesting that it cancels out in the equations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about solving the problem without knowing the mass. Others propose using free body diagrams and net forces to analyze the situation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using free body diagrams and the relationship between forces. There is mention of using conservation of energy as an alternative approach. However, no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the final speed of the roller coaster.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the hint to convert speed from km/h to m/s and raises concerns about the implications of friction on the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to incorporate the coefficient of friction into the analysis.

intrigue
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone. I'm new here at the forums, and I've got a little physics problem I'd like your input on:

"A roller coaster reaches the top of the steepest hill with a speed of 6.0 km/h. It then descends the hill, which is at an average angle of 45 degrees and is 45 m long. What will its speed be when it reaches the bottom? (Assume the coefficient of kinetic friction = 0.12)"

I believe this is intended to be an inclined plane problem, but I think that either the mass or the weight of the roller cart is necessary to determine the rate at which it accelerates down the hill. Is there some way of solving the problem with the information given or is it impossible to do so without somehow determining the mass of the cart? Thanks in advance.

-Intrigue-

PS It was hinted that we ought to convert km/h to m/s before attempting to solve the problem, but this does nothing to suggest the mass or the weight of the roller coaster. On an ideal coaster (without friction) it might be possible to calculate the weight of the cart based on its speed at the top of the hill with respect to the side it climbs before the descent (assuming that both sides are 45 meters long and at the same 45 degree angle) but the coefficient at the end of the problem assures the existence of at least some friction, so this idea doesn't work either. Please post your thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try it out. Mass will cancel out when you do it. Draw yourself a free body diagram and find the net forces in the horizontal and vertical direction. Then see if you can find your horizontal acceleration.
 
Of course! F=ma, so a=Fnet/m. Fx=mgcos45, and since the force of friction is equal to the coefficient of friction times the normal force (which is equal to Fy and also Fx in this case, since we're dealing with a 45-45-90 right triangle) it ends up equaling mgcos45 (the normal force) times the coefficient of friction, which was .12, as given in the equation.

We're left with another basic F=ma problem, if I did all of this right, except this time we remember that Fnet = Fx - Force of Friction:

a = F/m = [mgcos45 - (.12)mgcos45]/m

All three masses cancel, so we're left with:

gcos45-(.12)gcos45, which equals roughly 6.1 m/s^2

Then, using a constant acceleration problem involving distance, velocity, and acceleration and solving for velocity...

I got 23 m/s for the velocity at the bottom of the hill. Does that sound right to you?
 
You can also work this out using conservation of energy, if you like.
 
Do you get the same result?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K