Roots of Complex Numbers (proof)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the sum of the nth roots of unity, excluding 1, equals zero. The user is attempting to simplify the expression but feels stuck after two hours. A proof strategy is outlined, starting with the assumption that c^n = 1 and c ≠ 1, leading to the equation (c-1)(1 + c + c^2 + ... + c^{n-1}) = 0. By simplifying and equating terms, it is shown that S = (c^n - 1) / (c - 1), which leads to the conclusion that the sum equals zero. The proof is effectively completed by recognizing that the expression simplifies to zero when c is a root of unity.
DEMJ
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If c is any nth root of unity other than 1, then

1 + c + c^2 + \cdots + c^{n-1} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what is done so far and I am at a dead stall for about 2 hours lol. Any ideas on what I should be thinking of next? Should I continue simplifying? I have tried to continue simplifying but it always leads to nothing relevant. Do I need to be using re^{i\theta} ?

Proof:
Assume c^n = 1 and c \not = 1. Then c^n -1 = 0. Note that

(c-1)(1 + c + c^2 + \cdots + c^{n-1}) = (c)(1 + c + c^2 + \cdots c^{n-1}) + (-1)(1 + c + c^2 + \cdots + c^{n-1}) = c + c^2 + c^3 + \cdots + c^n - 1 - c - c^2 - \cdots - c^{n-1}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
my browser doesn't show tex properly, but simplify your final equation by cancelling terms & i think you're pretty much there...

you have shown c-1 does not = 0, and you know c^n-1=0, so what does equating your start & final expressions tell you?
 
Last edited:
S=1 + c + c^2 + \cdots + c^{n-1}

Sc=c+c^2+c^3 + \cdots + c^{n}

Sc-S=c^n-1

S(c-1)=c^n-1

S=\frac{c^n-1}{c-1}

So you got

\frac{c^n-1}{c-1}=0

I think you can solve it now. :wink:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
961
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K