MHB Roots of Equation: y^3+6y^2+11y+6 & 12y+8

  • Thread starter Thread starter danny12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the roots of two cubic equations: y^3+6y^2+11y+6=0 and y^3+6y^2+12y+8=0. The rational roots theorem is applied to the first equation, revealing -1, -2, and -3 as roots through systematic testing. For the second equation, a quick subtraction method suggests y = -2 as a root, but there is debate about whether both equations should be treated simultaneously. Participants emphasize the need to find all roots for both equations rather than just one. The conversation highlights the importance of thoroughness in solving polynomial equations.
danny12345
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
1)y^3+6y^2+11y+6=0
2)y^3+6y^2+12y+8=0
find it's root and tell me how you obtained it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the procedure outlined on this page.
 
dansingh said:
1)y^3+6y^2+11y+6=0
2)y^3+6y^2+12y+8=0
find it's root and tell me how you obtained it.

I'll work the first one, and then see if you can use the same procedure to work the second one.

1.) Let:

$$P(y)=y^3+6y^2+11y+6$$

Now, the rational roots theorem tells us that if $P$ has any rational roots, they must be come from a list of numbers generated by taking all of the factors of the constant term and dividing them by all of the factors of the leading coefficient. Since the leading coefficient is 1, we need only look at the factors of 6. Since all of the terms in $P$ have a " sign in front of them, we know any rational roots must be negative so that the terms with odd exponents will be negative and will cancel with the positive terms with even exponents. So, we look at this list as possible candidates:

$$y\in\{-1,-2,-3,-6\}$$

Proceeding systematically, we find:

$$P(-1)=(-1)^3+6(-1)^2+11(-1)+6=-1+6-11+6=0$$ and so we know -1 is a root.

$$P(-2)=(-2)^3+6(-2)^2+11(-2)+6=-8+24-22+6=0$$ and so we know -2 is a root.

$$P(-3)=(-3)^3+6(-3)^2+11(-3)+6=-27+54-33+6=0$$ and so we know -3 is a root.

Because a cubic polynomial can have no more than 3 roots, we are done. We can now state:

$$P(y)=y^3+6y^2+11y+6=(y+1)(y+2)(y+3)$$

If we had only found 1 rational root, then we could use polynomial division to obtain the other roots from the resulting quadratic quotient (using the quadratic formula or completing the square).
 
y^3+6y^2+11y+6=0
y^3+6y^2+12y+8=0

Well, if I got that on a timed test,
I'd simply subtract the equations
to get y+2 = 0, so y = -2

Would you give me a pass mark, Mark :)
 
Wilmer said:
y^3+6y^2+11y+6=0
y^3+6y^2+12y+8=0

Well, if I got that on a timed test,
I'd simply subtract the equations
to get y+2 = 0, so y = -2

Would you give me a pass mark, Mark :)

I don't think the two equations are simultaneous (even though the OP said "find its root" as if the two equations were one entity)...so if my interpretation is correct and unless you used this in lieu of the rational roots theorem to find a root as a starting point for both, I would have to deduct some points for not finding ALL roots of both equations. :)
 
MarkFL said:
I don't think the two equations are simultaneous (even though the OP said "find its root" as if the two equations were one entity)...so if my interpretation is correct and unless you used this in lieu of the rational roots theorem to find a root as a starting point for both, I would have to deduct some points for not finding ALL roots of both equations. :)
YA! On a timed test, that's all I'd want.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top