Roots of series of exponential raised to power of x?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation of a series of exponentials raised to the power of x, specifically in the form a1e-k1x + a2e-k2x + ... + ane-knx = 0. Participants explore various cases, particularly focusing on the scenario when n is greater than 2, and the implications of different values of k.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a solution for n=2, suggesting x = In(a1/a2) / (k1 - k2), but another points out that this requires a1 and a2 to have opposite signs.
  • There is a discussion about rewriting the equation and introducing complex numbers when necessary.
  • Several participants suggest letting y = e-x, leading to a polynomial in y, but there is contention about whether this results in a power series or a polynomial.
  • Concerns are raised about the solvability of higher-degree polynomials, particularly the fifth degree, with references to numerical methods and the lack of a general solution for such cases.
  • One participant introduces a specific polynomial problem involving rational exponents and discusses potential methods for solving it, including numerical approaches and the implications of fixed parameters.
  • There is an exploration of using series expansions and the conditions under which certain equations hold, with a focus on deriving equations for each term in the series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the solvability of the equations, the nature of the resulting polynomials, and the methods to approach these problems. No consensus is reached on a definitive solution or method applicable to all cases discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the equations and the potential need for numerical methods, particularly for higher-degree polynomials. There are also references to specific conditions and assumptions that may affect the outcomes of their proposed solutions.

Adel Makram
Messages
632
Reaction score
15
How to solve: a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x+...+ane-knx =0 for x?

For example in simple case of n=1,2.
a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x=0
the solution will be x=In (a1/a2) / [ k1-k2]. But for terms >2 what will be the solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Adel Makram said:
the solution will be x=In (a1/a2) / [ k1-k2].
No. Rewrite the equation: a_{1}e^{-k_{1}x}=-a_{2}e^{-k_{2}x} and you see that for your formula to work, a1 and a2 must have opposite signs. Otherwise you need to introduce somewhere.
 
yes agree, it was a typing mistakes, sorry. because In(negative number) does not exist.

So, again what will be the case if n>2?
 
Let y = e-x. If the k's are integers you have a polynomial in y, which may or may not be readily solvable.
 
mathman said:
Let y = e-x. If the k's are integers you have a polynomial in y, which may or may not be readily solvable.
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
 
Adel Makram said:
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
e^{-kx}=(e^{-x})^{k}
 
Adel Makram said:
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
You seem thoroughly confused! I said you get a polynomial, not a power series. The point of the original question is that the k's are different (integers?). Raising all e-k to the x power doesn't get you anywhere.
 
Adel Makram said:
How to solve: a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x+...+ane-knx =0 for x?

Let y=ex then
e-kix=y-ki
you get
a1y-k1+a2y-k2+...+any-kn =0
or for z=1/y=1/e-x
a1zk1+a2zk2+...+anzkn =0
you got polynomial.now ask yourself about x5-x-1=0
go here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_theory
to section
"A non-solvable quintic example"
 
why Fenix said:
Let y=ex then
e-kix=y-ki
you get
a1y-k1+a2y-k2+...+any-kn =0
or for z=1/y=1/e-x
a1zk1+a2zk2+...+anzkn =0
you got polynomial.now ask yourself about x5-x-1=0
go here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_theory
to section
"A non-solvable quintic example"
So how we can solve polynomial of 5th degree? and how can we calculate the roots of characteristics polynomial in problem of diagonalization of matrix of rank n>5 for example?
 
  • #10
Adel Makram said:
So how we can solve polynomial of 5th degree? and how can we calculate the roots of characteristics polynomial in problem of diagonalization of matrix of rank n>5 for example?
Because people making examples, problems, tasks, are not monsters, and usually polynomials have integer roots like {0,1,-1,2,-2,3,-3} or √2 or it combination with irrational i, that you can guess, or get close to guessing by looking at derivatives and how function is running.

Polynomial of 5th degree x5-x-1=0 is not looking scary. So why don't you solve it?
 
  • #11
The basic theorem is that there is no general solution for polynomials of fifth degree or higher. In practice, numerical methods are used when a specific equation is being solved.
 
  • #12
mathman said:
The basic theorem is that there is no general solution for polynomials of fifth degree or higher. In practice, numerical methods are used when a specific equation is being solved.

I have a polynomial of k where k could be integers or rationals, so how to solve a polynomial let`s say:
a1x11/4+a2x9/5+a3x7/3=0

in fact my problem is as follow:
a1x(1+2f)+a2x(1+f)+a3x(2+f)+a4xf+a5x=0

Where practically 1/2 <f<2
 
  • #13
It looks like you would need to use numerical methods.
 
  • #14
Adel Makram said:
in fact my problem is as follow:
a1x(1+2f)+a2x(1+f)+a3x(2+f)+a4xf+a5x=0
Where practically 1/2 <f<2

so at first post you wanted to solve something like this?
a1e(1+2f)x+a2e(1+f)x+a3e(2+f)x+a4efx+a5ex=0
by
##e^z=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{n!}##
we get
##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{a_1((1+2f)x)^n+a_2((1+f)x)^n+a_3((2+f)x)^n+a_4(fx)^n+a_5x^n}{n!}=0##
##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{a_1(1+2f)^nx^n+a_2(1+f)^nx^n+a_3(2+f)^nx^n+a_4f^nx^n+a_5x^n}{n!}=0##
##A=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{[a_1(1+2f)^n+a_2(1+f)^n+a_3(2+f)^n+a_4f^n+a_5]x^n}{n!}=0##
for fixed f ##\in (0.5,2)##
from Schwarz for ##a_n, b_n \in ℝ##
##|\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} a_n b_n|^2 \leq \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} |a_n|^2\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} |b_n|^2 ##
or some other way i think you have to show that ##a_1(1+2f)^n+a_2(1+f)^n+a_3(2+f)^n+a_4f^n+a_5=0## for every n if A=0.
I am not sure is it true.
Then you will get equations for every n...
##a_1(1+2f)+a_2(1+f)+a_3(2+f)+a_4f+a_5=0##
##a_1(1+2f)^2+a_2(1+f)^2+a_3(2+f)^2+a_4f^2+a_5=0##
.
..
...
hope it helps...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K