B Rotating Capacitor: Concentrating energy using accessible technology

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of achieving high energy density using a circular capacitor with rotating plates to prevent contact through magnetic repulsion. Initial ideas suggest that energy could accumulate indefinitely between the plates, but concerns arise regarding practical limitations, such as material damage and the potential for sparking. Participants emphasize that physics must consider real-world conditions, including the balance of magnetic and electrostatic forces and energy losses. Ultimately, the consensus is that the proposed system would not achieve sufficient energy density to shape spacetime, as sparking would occur long before reaching those levels. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the limitations of the concept, leading to its closure.
south
Messages
91
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
Concentrating energy using accessible technology.
Hello again. I am interested in the possibility of achieving a very high energy density, using accessible technical resources. I refer to the word accessible in terms of technical feasibility, not monetary cost.
---------
It all started by thinking about how it would be possible to avoid the plates of a circular capacitor that uses vacuum as a dielectric from touching, without placing material separators.
---------
After a week I thought of giving the capacitor a rotational movement, to produce magnetic repulsion between the electrically charged plates. I put an elementary graph to illustrate the idea.
---------
Rotat Cap.png

--------
Some time later I noticed that the Poynting vector is very small in a large part of the space between plates. Consequently the system radiates very little and the energy generated accumulates inside. The longer the system rotates, the more energy is accumulated. I assume there is no theoretical limit to the accumulation and that the energy density between the plates of the circular capacitor will then grow as much as the operator decides, without limit in abstract terms. In concrete terms, materials can be damaged when the energy density reaches too high values. My intention is for the moment to reason in ideal conditions, without taking into account practical conditions.
---------
- What do you think of the idea?
- Could it be viable?
- Would it achieve a sufficient energy density to shape spacetime between the plates of the rotating capacitor?
- Could the construction of the device be an affordable task for today's engineers?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Some time later I noticed that the Poynting vector is very small in a large part of the space between plates. Consequently the system radiates very little and the energy generated accumulates inside. The longer the system rotates, the more energy is accumulated. I assume there is no theoretical limit to the accumulation and that the energy density between the plates of the circular capacitor will then grow as much as the operator decides, without limit in abstract terms. In concrete terms, materials can be damaged when the energy density reaches too high values. My intention is for the moment to reason in ideal conditions, without taking into account practical conditions.

Physics is concerned with practical conditions though, you can't divorce physics from reality the way you can with math. Ignoring the entire balancing of magentic forces with electrostatic ones to provide some sort of serperation, losses from various types of radiation, if the materials can survive, etc, eventually you will have a strong enough field to literally rip electrons off and spark between the plates.

- Would it achieve a sufficient energy density to shape spacetime between the plates of the rotating capacitor?

Definitly not. You'll be sparking across the plates long before you get anywhere close.
 
  • Like
Likes south
south said:
TL;DR Summary: Concentrating energy using accessible technology.

Consequently the system radiates very little and the energy generated accumulates inside. The longer the system rotates, the more energy is accumulated.
The stationary rotation make B field which generate energy and angular momentum in combination with E, but it does not keep on producing and accumulating more and more energy.

Fig 27-6 in https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_27.html shows E,B fields and poynting vector loop generated by one of your paired charged disk. In the +- pair superposition, we would observe cancelling each other out almost in far area.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes south
QuarkyMeson said:
Definitly not. You'll be sparking across the plates long before you get anywhere close.
anuttarasammyak said:
The stationary rotation make B field which generate energy and angular momentum in combination with E, but it does not keep on producing and accumulating more and more energy.

Fig 27-6 in https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_27.html shows E,B fields and poynting vector loop generated by one of your paired charged disk. In the +- pair superposition, we would observe cancelling each other out almost in far area.
Good morning. Thank you for your attention. The plates rotate in opposite directions. I had doubts about how this is indicated in the drawing. I edited it and it seems that I did not do it well.
 
If the energy cannot be accumulated, we do not need to extend the consultation any further. I would like to take this opportunity to thank each person who has been present.
 
south said:
If the energy cannot be accumulated, we do not need to extend the consultation any further. I would like to take this opportunity to thank each person who has been present.
Thank you, thread is now closed.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K