Rotation period vs. mass of planets in solar system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correlation between the mass of planets in the solar system and their rotation periods. Participants suggest that heavier planets tend to rotate faster, potentially due to tidal friction affecting smaller, closer planets more significantly. However, the slower rotation of Uranus and Neptune compared to Jupiter and Saturn raises questions about initial rotation speeds. The conversation also touches on forum moderation issues regarding post deletions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary physics and dynamics
  • Familiarity with tidal friction concepts
  • Knowledge of the solar system's structure and planetary characteristics
  • Awareness of forum moderation practices and guidelines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of tidal friction on planetary rotation
  • Explore the initial formation theories of the solar system
  • Study the rotational dynamics of gas giants versus terrestrial planets
  • Investigate the criteria for forum post moderation and community guidelines
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, educators, and anyone interested in planetary science and the dynamics of celestial bodies.

pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I just realize that for most of the planets in our solar system, the heavier the planet, the faster it rotates around its axis. Do you think there may be any reasons for that?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Guess:
If all planets started out rotating fast, then the smaller planets and also closer to the sun would be affected more by tidal friction than the more distant large planets.
 
mathman said:
Guess:
If all planets started out rotating fast, then the smaller planets and also closer to the sun would be affected more by tidal friction than the more distant large planets.

So it won't explain why Uranus or Neptune rotates slower than Jupiter or Saturn.
 
If the initial rotation speeds were different, then the current speeds don't have to have an exact relationship.
 
Where is the post by starz9? I was reading it.
 
pixel01 said:
Where is the post by starz9? I was reading it.
It was deleted for not meeting forum guidelines.
 
russ_watters said:
It was deleted for not meeting forum guidelines.

Thanks. I was just about to ask if it could be deleted.
 
When my post was deleted I thought it was due to my inclusion of my book title and a link to my web site, so I eliminated those items and tried to repost unsuccessfully.

Mr. Russ Watters was kind enough to send me an email explaining why the Forum was of the view my post did not adhere to your rules. DH makes the view unanimous.
It is your right to decide what you like and what you do not. I respect that. However, I would have been much more impressed if the staff could have shown where I'm wrong.
Best wished and Bye, James J. Wood, Sr.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K