Rotation problem solved with conservation of energy.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a rotational motion problem involving a uniform hollow disk supported by wires. The user applies the conservation of energy principle, leading to the equation mgh = 0.5mv² + 0.5m(r1² + r2²)(v²/x²). The user initially miscalculated the variable x, which represents the distance from the center of the disk to the axis of rotation, ultimately determining it to be 0.7. After clarification, the user realizes the importance of including all factors in the rotational kinetic energy equation, specifically the missing coefficient of 0.5, which led to the correct velocity of 3.74 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with rotational motion concepts
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the relationship between linear and angular velocity
  • Explore advanced applications of conservation of energy in rotational dynamics
  • Practice solving problems involving rolling motion and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding rotational dynamics and energy conservation principles.

btbam91
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I have a quick problem.

A uniform hollow disk has two pieces of thin light wire wrapped around its outer rim and is supported from the ceiling (the figure ). Suddenly one of the wires breaks, and the remaining wire does not slip as the disk rolls down.


YF-10-51.jpg


Use energy conservation to find the speed of the center of this disk after it has fallen a distance of 1.20 .

So I get.

mgh = .5mv^2 + .5m(r1^2+r2^2)(v^2/x^2)


Okay, so I ran through this problem yesterday and my my problem was determining the value of x in the above equation. Thing is, I found it to be .7 yesterday and popped out the correct answer for the velocity as 3.74 m/s.

The problem today is, I have no idea how I found that x to be .7. It makes no sense because I thought that x represented the distance from the center of the disc to the axis of rotation, which just be .5 no?

This is bugging me dearly, so thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4.5 hours later........

the equation for rotational kinetic energy has a .5 and so does the formula for the moment of inertia. I was missing one of the .5's.FINALLY!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K