Rotational Dynamics of a plank of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a thin plank of mass M and length l, which is pivoted at one end and released from an angle of 60 degrees from the vertical. The objective is to determine the magnitude and direction of the force on the pivot when the plank reaches a horizontal position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the plank when it is horizontal, including gravitational force and the pivot force. There are attempts to relate these forces to centripetal acceleration and torque. Questions arise regarding the correctness of calculations and assumptions made during the reasoning process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, providing feedback on the mathematical approaches taken. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of conservation of energy and the need to consider both translational and rotational kinetic energy. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the angles used in calculations and the assumptions regarding the center of mass. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the role of torque in the context of the problem.

jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



A thin plank of mass M and length l is pivoted at one end. The plank is released at 60 degrees from the vertical. What is the magnitiude and direction of the force on the pivot when the plank is horizontal.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



So, here's what I worked out ...

Reasoning:
I figured that when the plank is horizontal there are two forces acting on it: The graviational force and the force of the pivot on the plank (which is a radial force). Since the gravitational force has no component in the radial direction when the plank is horizontal, the force required to keep the plank in uniform circular motion must supplied by the force of the pivot on the plank. Using Newton's Third Law, we see that the force of the plank on the pivot is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force of the pivot on the plank. Therefore, we just need to calculate the force of the pivot on the plank (the centripetal force needed to keep the plank in uniform circular motion) in order to find the desired quantity. Denote this force by F.

Calculations:
Let dF be the force exerted by the pivot on a small segment of mass dM at a radial distance r from the pivot. This means that ...

dF = w2r dM

where w is angular velocity of the rod when it's horizontal. Assuming that the mass density of the rod is uniform, we see that k = dM/dr = M/l. Using this information in the above equation, we get ...

dF = kw2r dr

Integrating this gives ...

F = \int_0^l k\omega^2r \, dr = k\omega^2\int_0^lr \, dr = \frac{k\omega^2l^2}{2} = \frac{M\omega^2l}{2}


Is this right so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculations cont:
We can find the net torque acting on the plank if we treat it as if all of the mass were concentrated at the center of mass. Therefore, this torque is given by ...

\tau = I\alpha = \frac{ML^2}{3}\alpha = \frac{Mgl}{2}\sin{(\theta)}

This can be written ...

\alpha = \ddot{\theta} = \frac{3g}{2l}\sin{(\theta)}

Therefore,

\dot{\theta}\ddot{\theta} = \frac{3g}{2l}\sin{(\theta)}\dot{\theta}

Integrating this, we see that ...

\frac{\dot{\theta}^2}{2} \bigg{|}_0^{\omega} = \frac{3g}{2l}\int_{\pi/3}^{\pi/2}\cos{\theta}\,d\theta

Solving this equation, we get ...

\frac{\omega^2}{2} = -\frac{3g}{2l}\cos{(\theta)}\bigg{|}_{\pi/3}^{\pi/2} = \frac{3g}{4l}

Is this right in the context of the problem?
 
hi jgens! :smile:
jgens said:
A thin plank of mass M and length l is pivoted at one end. The plank is released at 60 degrees from the vertical. What is the magnitiude and direction of the force on the pivot when the plank is horizontal.

Reasoning:
I figured that when the plank is horizontal there are two forces acting on it: The graviational force and the force of the pivot on the plank (which is a radial force). Since the gravitational force has no component in the radial direction when the plank is horizontal, the force required to keep the plank in uniform circular motion must supplied by the force of the pivot on the plank. Using Newton's Third Law, we see that the force of the plank on the pivot is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force of the pivot on the plank. Therefore, we just need to calculate the force of the pivot on the plank (the centripetal force needed to keep the plank in uniform circular motion) …

that's really good! :smile:

unfortunately you then left the path of reason and went berserk with equations about torque :redface:

go back to your reasoned argument … horizontal force = mass times centripetal acceleration of the centre of mass …

so get the acceleration from the angular velocity, and get the angular velocity from conservation of energy! :wink:

(btw, you didn't need that integration in your first post … if you look at ∫ r dr, you can see it's bound to always give you the position of the centre of mass, in this case at L/2! :wink:)
 
Okay, so for conservation of energy, we can express everything in terms of translation and rotation of the center of mass. Initially, all of the energy is potential energy, and the potential energy at the CM is ...

Mgh = \frac{Mgl\cos{\theta}}{2} = \frac{Mgl\cos{\pi/6}}{2} = \frac{Mgl\sqrt{3}}{4}

By the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy, this is equal to the rotational and translational kinetic energy of the CM. Since the CM isn't rotating, this gives us the equation

\frac{Mgl\sqrt{3}}{4} = \frac{1}{2}MV^2 = \frac{1}{8}M\omega^2l^2

Solving for \omega^2 yields,

2\sqrt{3}\frac{g}{l}


This doesn't look right though, so I think that I've done something wrong. By the way, what doesn't work about my argument with torque?
 
jgens said:
Since the CM isn't rotating …

uhh? :redface: that doesn't mean anything! :confused:

the rod is rotating, so you do need to add the rotational KE

(and btw, either you used the wrong angle, or you used cos instead of sin)
By the way, what doesn't work about my argument with torque?


it's probably ok, but i couldn't be bothered to check it! :redface:

try again! :smile:

(and now I'm off to bed :zzz:)​
 
Okay! Now I understand you. And going through the calculations it looks like it should give me the same result as my argument with torque. That's a relief.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K