Rotational inertia of square about axis perpendicular to its plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a square about an axis perpendicular to its plane. Users discuss the relationship between the moment of inertia of a square and a circle, concluding that the moment of inertia of the square is less than that of the circle due to the distribution of mass. The key equations discussed include I_z = \int r^2 \, dm and I_z = mr^2 for circular shapes, while the square's moment of inertia can be derived using the parallel axis theorem and integration techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic geometry of squares and circles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for various shapes, focusing on squares and circles
  • Learn about the parallel axis theorem and its applications in physics
  • Explore integral calculus techniques for calculating moments of inertia
  • Investigate the relationship between mass distribution and moment of inertia in different geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics who are interested in understanding the principles of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia calculations.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1676258596802.png

How do we calculate the moment of inertia of (2) and (3)?

For (3) I have tried,

##I_z = \int r^2 \, dm ##
## ds = r ## ##d\theta ##
##\lambda = \frac {dm}{ds}##
##\lambda ## ##ds = dm ##
## \lambda r ## ##d\theta = dm ##
##I_z = \lambda \int r^3 d\theta ##
##I_z = \lambda \int_0^{2\pi} r^3 d\theta ##

EDIT:
I know how to find the moment of inertia of (3) (shown in post ##2), however, how do I find the moment of inertia of the square about z-axis?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the Iz equation and think about what it means for each of the cases. You do not need to calculate anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Frabjous said:
Look at the Iz equation and think about what it means for each of the cases. You do not need to calculate anything.
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

I see what you mean for (3)! So
##I_z = \int r^2 dm##
##I_z = r^2 \int dm## (since a circle has a constant radius)
##I_z = mr^2##

However, how would I find the moment of inertia of the square?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

I see what you mean for (3)! So
##I_z = \int r^2 dm##
##I_z = r^2 \int dm## (since a circle has a constant radius)
##I_z = mr^2##

However, how would I find the moment of inertia of the square?

Many thanks!
You don’t need to. Notice that the square fits inside the circle. What does this imply?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz and member 731016
Frabjous said:
You don’t need to. Notice that the square fits inside the circle. What does this imply?
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

It implies that ##I_{square} < I_{circle} ## (since mass elements are either the same radius or closer than the circle) so ##I_{square} < mr^2##. However, how do we calculate the square's specific moment of inertia?

Many thanks!
 
Notice that each side of the square will have the same inertia. Take two points, like (r,0) and (0,r), and write down the equation of the line that connects them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Callumnc1 said:
##I_z = \lambda \int_0^{2\pi} r^3 d\theta ##
Fwiw, you can get Iz that way. Just do the integral (trivial) then substitute for λ using m and r.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Frabjous said:
Notice that each side of the square will have the same inertia. Take two points, like (r,0) and (0,r), and write down the equation of the line that connects them.
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous !

The equation I got was ##y = -x + r##

Thank you!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

It implies that ##I_{square} < I_{circle} ## (since mass elements are either the same radius or closer than the circle) so ##I_{square} < mr^2##. However, how do we calculate the square's specific moment of inertia?

Many thanks!
Rotate it by 90 degrees. Then just focus on the top horizontal segment. Multiply the result by 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous and member 731016
  • #10
haruspex said:
Fwiw, you can get Iz that way. Just do the integral (trivial) then substitute for λ using m and r.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

Sorry, how do you get ##r## in terms of ##\theta##?

Thank you!
 
  • #11
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

Sorry, how do you get ##r## in terms of ##\theta##?

Thank you!
In (3), r is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #12
haruspex said:
In (3), r is constant.
Whoops thank you @haruspex! I see now :)
 
  • #13
erobz said:
Rotate it by 90 degrees. Then just focus on the top horizontal segment. Multiply the result by 4.
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

Oh ok, so maybe I use Pythagorean theorem?

Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #14
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

Oh ok, so maybe I use Pythagorean theorem?

Thank you!
That’s the idea. You know the diagonal of the square ##2r##, the rest you can figure out with that info.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #15
You can do this without extra integrals. You can calculate the moment of inertia of one of the sides around the center by using the parallel axis theorem. You know the moment of inrtia about an axis going through the middle of the side. ##I=\frac{1}{12}ma^2## where m is the mass of one of the sides (1/4 of the total mass) and a is the side of the square. Then just add the ## m(a/2)^2## to get the moment about the center of the square (a/2 is the distance between the two centers). Once you know the moment of one side, you multiply by 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, member 731016, erobz and 1 other person
  • #16
Thank you both @erobz and @nasu for your replies!

I will try again with those hints, and let you know how I get on.

Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #17
So far @erobz and @nasu I have got

## I = \int r^2 dm ##
## I = \int R^2 + x^2 dm ## Where ##2R## is the length of the diagonal which means that each side as a length ## 2(2)^{1/2} ##
$$ I = \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} R^2 + x^2 dx $$
## I = \lambda R^2 + \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} x^2 dx ##

Is everything so far correct?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Callumnc1 said:
So far @erobz and @nasu I have got

## I = \int r^2 dm ##
## I = \int R^2 + x^2 dm ## Where ##2R## is the length of the diagonal which means that each side as a length ## 2(2)^{1/2} ##
## I = \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} R^2 + x^2 dx ##
## I = \lambda R^2 + \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} x^2 dx ##

Is everything so far correct?

Many thanks!
Check your algebra for ##r^2##. I do not get ##r^2 = R^2 + x^2##. Remember ##2R## is the squares diagonal. (that's not the only problem, but it's the first problem I see).

P.S. use the $ sign delimiters for the latex. It formats more readable with integrals and limits.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #19
erobz said:
Check your algebra for ##r^2##. I do not get ##r^2 = R^2 + x^2##. Remember ##2R## is the squares diagonal. (that's not the only problem, but it's the first problem I see).

P.S. use the $ sign delimiters for the latex. It formats more readable with integrals and limits.
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

Sorry, what do you mean about r?
1676345374197.png

Where R is a constant and x is a variable in the y-direction.

Many thanks?
 
  • #20
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

Sorry, what do you mean about r?
View attachment 322246
Where R is a constant and x is a variable in the y-direction.

Many thanks?
1676346427871.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #22
##\lambda R^2 ## does not have the right dimension to be a term in the moment of inertia.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #23
nasu said:
##\lambda R^2 ## does not have the right dimension to be a term in the moment of inertia.
True, thanks for pointing that out @nasu!
 
  • #24
nasu said:
##\lambda R^2 ## does not have the right dimension to be a term in the moment of inertia.
Are you saying that I can't take ##\lambda R^2 ## out of the integral since it is a constant in the space integral?

Many thanks!
 
  • #25
erobz said:
So the new integral is so far,

$$ I = \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} 2R^2 + x^2 dx $$
$$ I = \frac {M}{4(2)^{1/2}R} \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} 2R^2 + x^2 dx $$

Many thanks!
 
  • #26
Callumnc1 said:
Are you saying that I can't take ##\lambda R^2 ## out of the integral since it is a constant in the space integral?

Many thanks!
You can't just take it out of the integral unchanged. How do you integrate a constant wrt x?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #27
haruspex said:
You can't just take it out of the integral unchanged. How do you integrate a constant wrt x?
Thank you for your reply @haruspex! I completely forgot! Integrating ##R^2## wrt to x is ##R^2x##

Thank you!
 
  • #28
Callumnc1 said:
So the new integral is so far,

$$ I = \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} 2R^2 + x^2 dx $$
$$ I = \frac {M}{4(2)^{1/2}R} \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} 2R^2 + x^2 dx $$

Many thanks!
The function for square root in latex is \sqrt{} Also, I wouldn't substitute for ##\lambda## just yet, its just more symbols to juggle IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #29
Callumnc1 said:
So the new integral is so far,

$$ I = \lambda \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R} (2R^2 + x^2) dx $$
$$ I = \frac {M}{4(2)^{1/2}R} \int_{-(2)^{1/2}R}^{(2)^{1/2}R}( 2R^2 + x^2 )dx $$

Many thanks!
You need to put some parantheses inside the integral. Otherwise it does not make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and erobz
  • #30
erobz said:
The function for square root in latex is \sqrt{} Also, I wouldn't substitute for ##\lambda## just yet, its just more symbols to juggle IMO.
Ok thank you @erobz , that is good advice!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K