Rotational Kinematics - Angular Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a phonograph turntable that continues to rotate after being switched off, with a focus on determining the angular deceleration under the assumption of constant angular deceleration. The subject area is rotational kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to angular deceleration and the unit conversions involved. There is an exploration of the original poster's method for determining time and angular acceleration, with some questioning the accuracy of the unit conversions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the unit conversion process and identifying potential errors in the original calculations. There is a recognition of differing results, and some guidance has been offered regarding unit conversion methods.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for accurate unit conversions, particularly when transitioning between different units of angular velocity and acceleration. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the conversion process.

nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A phonograph turntable with an initial angular velocity of 78 rpm continues turning for 40 rotations after being switched off. What is the angular deceleration of the turntable? Assume constant angular deceleration.

Homework Equations



\alpha=(\omega-\omega0)/t

θ-θ0=1/2(\omega0+\omega)t

The Attempt at a Solution



t = (40 rot - 0 rot) / 1/2(78 rpm + 0 rpm) = 40/39 min

\alpha = (0 rpm - 78 rpm) / (40/39 min) = -76.05 rpm2

The answer needs to be in rad/s2

(-76.05 rpm2)(2∏ rad/rot)(min2/s2)=-7.96 rad/s2


The back of the book tells me this answer is incorrect. I would appreciate any insight into the error(s) I am making.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sure you made the right unit convertion? I get 0.84 rad/s^2 is that what you needed? Else I think the mistake lies elsewhere.
 
Hi hjelmgart,

Thanks for your reply. I'm pretty sure that my error lies in the unit conversion - did you do what I did in the conversion in the original post, or something else?
 
Not entirely. I don't understand how you reached that result also. rpm = rev/min

(1/min)^2 = 1/(60min/s)^2

rev^2 = (2*Pi)^2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ah, I wasn't squaring the seconds unit when converting. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K