Rotational Kinematics of a turntable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in rotational kinematics involving a uniform disk and a non-rotating rod that is dropped onto the disk. Participants are exploring the implications of conservation of angular momentum in determining the final angular velocity of the combined system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering the conservation of angular momentum as a key principle, with some questioning the equality of the radius of the rod and the disk. Others suggest analyzing the problem using rotational kinetic energy, noting the differences in moments of inertia between the rod and the disk.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided mathematical expressions related to angular momentum, while others are seeking clarification on the assumptions made regarding the system's parameters.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the radius of the rod compared to the disk, and the problem does not provide specific information about the rod beyond its mass being equal to that of the disk.

ziggo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Good afternoon! I've been mulling over this question for a bit and I can't seem to understand what it is asking. This is a question for an introductory calculus-based physics university course.

1. The Problem:

A uniform disk, such as a record turntable, turns 8.0 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A non-rotating rod of the same mass as the disk is dropped onto the freely spinning disk so that both turn around the spindle. Determine the angular velocity of the combination in rev/s.

2. Equations used:

I interpreted this as a conservation of angular momentum problem where the radius remains constant:

m r^2 ω = m(disc and rod) r ^2 ω(final)

3. The solution:

Since the radius remains constant and the mass doubles, both the mass and radius^2 can be removed from both sides leaving:

ω(initial) = 2ω(final)

and since the initial angular velocity was 16π Rad/s the final angular velocity would be 8π Rad/s.

Am I in the ballpark here assuming that this question is concerning the conservation of angular momentum? I don't see any other way to incorporate mass other than using Newton's laws, but I'm not sure on that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the radius of the rod and the disc necessarily equal?
 
The problem doesn't state it unfortunately.
 
The first thing that comes to my mind is to try solving it with energy, since the moments of inertia of a rod and a disc are different. Have you covered rotational kinetic energy yet?
 
Conservation of angular momentum gives
##m_dr_d^2\omega_0= \omega_1(m_dr_d^2+m_r r_r^2)## so ## \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_1}=\frac{I_d+I_r}{I_d}##. The subscripts are 'r' for the rod and 'd' for the disc and ##I## is a moment of inertia. I'm assuming the rod and the disc have ##I=mr^2/2##.
 
ryandaly said:
The first thing that comes to my mind is to try solving it with energy, since the moments of inertia of a rod and a disc are different. Have you covered rotational kinetic energy yet?

We have, but I'm not sure how to imply it in this case without any information concerning the rod other than that it has the same mass as the disc and it is now a part of the system.
 
Mentz114 said:
Conservation of angular momentum gives
##m_dr_d^2\omega_0= \omega_1(m_dr_d^2+m_r r_r^2)## so ## \frac{\omega_0}{\omega_1}=\frac{I_d+I_r}{I_d}##. The subscripts are 'r' for the rod and 'd' for the disc and ##I## is a moment of inertia. I'm assuming the rod and the disc have ##I=mr^2/2##.

This is a very good analysis of it, and this is what I would break it down as. I simply solved it for final angular velocity or "omega 1"
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K