Rotational Motion and Moment of Inertia Questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around two physics problems involving rotational motion and moment of inertia. The first problem involves a uniform rod of mass 0.93 kg and length 17 m, pivoted at one end, where the user incorrectly calculates the angular speed when the rod is horizontal. The second problem involves two pulley wheels with combined moment of inertia of 4.5 kg*m², where the user seeks to find the angular acceleration of the system with attached masses. Both calculations are flawed, indicating a misunderstanding of the principles of energy conservation and the application of moment of inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and angular motion
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Ability to apply Newton's second law for rotational systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of energy conservation in rotational motion
  • Learn how to derive angular acceleration from moment of inertia
  • Study the relationship between linear and angular quantities in rotational systems
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple masses and pulleys
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of common misconceptions in rotational motion and moment of inertia calculations.

hoseA
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
:confused:

1.)

A uniform rod of mass 0.93 kg is 17 m long.
The rod is pivoted about a horizontal, fric-
tionless pin at the end of a thin extension (of
negligible mass) a distance 17 m from the cen-
ter of mass of the rod. Initially the rod makes
an angle of 70 degrees with the horizontal. The rod
is released from rest at an angle of 70 degrees with
the horizontal.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2.
Hint: The moment of inertia of the rod
about its center-of-mass is 1/12 ML^2.

What is the angular speed of the rod at
the instant the rod is in a horizontal position?
Answer in units of rad/s.

MgL/2 = .5(1/12ML^2)w^2

This works out to be:

w = sqrt(12g/L)

w = 2.630142 ?

But the answer is wrong?? why?!
---------------------------------------
2.
Two pulley wheels, or respective radii R1 =
0.34 m and R2 = 1.5 m are mounted rigidly
on a common axle and clamped together. The
combined moment of inertia of the two wheels
is I + 4.5 kg*m^2.
Mass m1 = 18 kg is attached to a cord
wrapped around the first wheel, and another
mass m2 = 5.9 kg is attached to another cord
wrapped around the second wheel.

The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 :
Find the angular acceleration of the system.
Take clockwise direction as positive. Answer
in units of rad/s^2.

I = .5MR^2

I1= .5(18)(.34)^2
I2= .5(5.9)(1.5)^2

I = I1 +I2 + 4.5 = 12.1779

Acceleration= [(m2gR2)-(m1gR1)]/[I+(m1r1^2)+(m2r2^2)]

= .971689752 ??

This is wrong as well, WHY??!?

Please help. All help is appreciated. :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
someone pls help me!... any hints appreciated. :)
 
hoseA said:
:confused:
What is the angular speed of the rod at
the instant the rod is in a horizontal position?
Answer in units of rad/s.
MgL/2 = .5(1/12ML^2)w^2
How did you get that equation? Where have you used the fact that the rod is initially inclined at an angle of 70 degrees to the horizontal?
 
siddharth said:
How did you get that equation? Where have you used the fact that the rod is initially inclined at an angle of 70 degrees to the horizontal?

What equation should I use then?

I found a similar pbm online that used that equation- apparently it's wrong.
 
Well, have you thought about what concept or principle you might use to attempt this question?
 
siddharth said:
Well, have you thought about what concept or principle you might use to attempt this question?
I know it uses Moment of Inertia in the equation... that's abt it.

I'm totally lost as to how to approach it.
 
hoseA said:
I'm totally lost as to how to approach it.
I understand that, but it's important to think in terms of principles and concepts rather than equations. The equations will easily follow once you understand what's happening.
For instance,in this problem, what can you say about the energy of the system?
 
Last edited:
siddharth said:
I understand that, but it's important to think in terms of principles and concepts rather than equations. The equations will easily follow once you understand what's happening.
For instance,in this problem, what can you say about the energy of the system?

Well, my brain isn't working at the moment.

I'll look at this tomorrow. Thanks for your help, nandrie, vannakam _/\_ ;).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K