1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rotational Motion relationship between 2 disks

  1. Oct 26, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Two disks are mounted on a frictionless vertical shaft of neglible radius.

    The lower disk, of mass 440g and radius 3.5cm, is rotating at 180rpm on the frictionless shaft of neglible radius. The upper disk, of mass 270g and radius 2.3cm, is initially not rotating. It drops freely down the shaft onto the lower disk, and frictional forces act to bring the two disks to a common rotational speed.

    (a) What is that speed?
    (b) What fraction of the initial kinetic energy is lost to friction?

    2. Relevant equations

    T = tau
    w= omega
    R = Radius
    m1 = mass lower disk
    m2 = mass upper disk
    I = rotational inertia = (1/2)mR^2 (for disks)
    upper disk = ud
    lower disk = ld
    alpha = angular acceleration
    a(tan) = tangential linear acceleration

    Ok, i will just pop out some equations:

    T = I*alpha
    w = w0 + alpha*t
    a(tan) = alpha*R
    K(rotational) = (1/2)Iw^2

    3. The attempt at a solution

    can we somehow use the K(rotational) equation to solve both?

    well first i converted (inital omega of the lower disk) w0(ld) 180rpm = 18.8 rad/s
    w0(ud) = 0

    we know that wf(ud) = wf(ld) and we need to figure that out

    the m has to be in kg so -->
    m(ld) = 0.440kg m(ud) = 0.270kg

    Kf - Ki = deltaK lost from frictional force?

    (1/2)(m1 + m2)*wf^2 - (1/2)(m1)w0^2 = delta K lost?

    Any help would be great.
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 26, 2007 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    what's conserved?

    When the upper disk drops onto the lower disk, is anything conserved?
  4. Oct 26, 2007 #3
    hmmmm...i'm guessing momentum?
  5. Oct 26, 2007 #4

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Make that angular momentum.
  6. Oct 26, 2007 #5
    ok, talk to me Doc!
  7. Oct 26, 2007 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Set up an equation for conservation of angular momentum.
  8. Oct 26, 2007 #7
    I'm reading the chapter as we speak...give me a few moments...
  9. Oct 26, 2007 #8
    I1w1 = I2w2
  10. Oct 26, 2007 #9
    [(1/2)M1*R1^2]*w0 = wf[(1/2)M2*R2^2 +(1/2)M1*R1^2] -->

    wf = [(1/2)M1*R1^2]*w0 / [(1/2)M2*R2^2 +(1/2)M1*R1^2]

    how's that look?
  11. Oct 26, 2007 #10

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

  12. Oct 26, 2007 #11
    it certainly is...because it's correct!

    the answer is 14.9 rad/s = 142rpm

    I'm starting to love you Doc :wink: Thanks...AGAIN!

    Now, i'm moving onto the next part...
  13. Oct 26, 2007 #12
    Ok doc.

    To determine energy lost to frictional force, energy is not conserved. Therefore-->

    Ki - Kf = [tex]\Delta[/tex]K ---> K lost

    Of course we'll be using K for rotational motion which =

    (1/2)Iw^2 -->therefore --->

    Ki = (1/2)I1 * w1i^2 -->no angular velocity on I2 so = 0 -->
    Kf = (1/2)wf^2 * [I1 + I2]

    (1/2)I1 * w1i^2 - (1/2)wf^2 * [I1 + I2] = [tex]\Lambda[/tex]K

    Is this the right idea?
  14. Oct 26, 2007 #13

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    You got it!
  15. Oct 26, 2007 #14
    yes, it's right. 20.6% change in K.

    Doc, is it possible to solve this problem using a different method?

    Such as Tau = I*alpha or using cirlcular motion equations?
  16. Oct 26, 2007 #15

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This is by far the easiest way, since you don't have to know anything about the details of the forces between the two disks or the time it takes them to reach a common speed. (But you should be able to solve it by making up some generic assumptions about forces.)
  17. Nov 3, 2007 #16
    I am working on a very similar problem but am having trouble calculating the kinetic energy lost to friction. Is this just the change in kinetic energy? If so, my answer is off by 0.3% which is a lot for this particular problem.
  18. Nov 3, 2007 #17
    follow the steps i went through and you shouldn't have a problem getting that number. Don't round the significant figures toward the end, and you should get that number.

    K_i - K_f = K_lost
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Rotational Motion relationship between 2 disks
  1. Rotational motion 2 (Replies: 8)