Rotational Motion relationship between 2 disks

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two disks mounted on a frictionless vertical shaft, where the lower disk is rotating and the upper disk drops onto it, leading to a common rotational speed. The context includes concepts from rotational motion and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of angular momentum as a key principle when the upper disk drops onto the lower disk. They explore the use of equations related to rotational kinetic energy and the relationship between initial and final states of the disks.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in a productive dialogue, with some suggesting the setup of equations for conservation of angular momentum and others confirming the correctness of the derived equations. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, particularly regarding energy loss due to friction.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific values and calculations, but the discussion also highlights potential variations in methods and assumptions regarding forces and energy conservation. Some participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of their calculations, particularly in relation to kinetic energy lost.

gills
Messages
115
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two disks are mounted on a frictionless vertical shaft of neglible radius.

The lower disk, of mass 440g and radius 3.5cm, is rotating at 180rpm on the frictionless shaft of neglible radius. The upper disk, of mass 270g and radius 2.3cm, is initially not rotating. It drops freely down the shaft onto the lower disk, and frictional forces act to bring the two disks to a common rotational speed.

(a) What is that speed?
(b) What fraction of the initial kinetic energy is lost to friction?

Homework Equations



T = tau
w= omega
R = Radius
m1 = mass lower disk
m2 = mass upper disk
I = rotational inertia = (1/2)mR^2 (for disks)
upper disk = ud
lower disk = ld
alpha = angular acceleration
a(tan) = tangential linear acceleration
t=time

Ok, i will just pop out some equations:

T = I*alpha
w = w0 + alpha*t
a(tan) = alpha*R
K(rotational) = (1/2)Iw^2


The Attempt at a Solution



can we somehow use the K(rotational) equation to solve both?

well first i converted (inital omega of the lower disk) w0(ld) 180rpm = 18.8 rad/s
w0(ud) = 0

we know that wf(ud) = wf(ld) and we need to figure that out

the m has to be in kg so -->
m(ld) = 0.440kg m(ud) = 0.270kg


Kf - Ki = deltaK lost from frictional force?

(1/2)(m1 + m2)*wf^2 - (1/2)(m1)w0^2 = delta K lost?

Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what's conserved?

When the upper disk drops onto the lower disk, is anything conserved?
 
Doc Al said:
When the upper disk drops onto the lower disk, is anything conserved?

hmmmm...i'm guessing momentum?
 
Make that angular momentum.
 
Doc Al said:
Make that angular momentum.

ok, talk to me Doc!
 
Set up an equation for conservation of angular momentum.
 
Doc Al said:
Set up an equation for conservation of angular momentum.

I'm reading the chapter as we speak...give me a few moments...
 
Doc Al said:
Set up an equation for conservation of angular momentum.

I1w1 = I2w2
 
[(1/2)M1*R1^2]*w0 = wf[(1/2)M2*R2^2 +(1/2)M1*R1^2] -->

wf = [(1/2)M1*R1^2]*w0 / [(1/2)M2*R2^2 +(1/2)M1*R1^2]


how's that look?
 
  • #10
Wonderful.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Wonderful.

it certainly is...because it's correct!

the answer is 14.9 rad/s = 142rpm

I'm starting to love you Doc :wink: Thanks...AGAIN!

Now, I'm moving onto the next part...
 
  • #12
Ok doc.

To determine energy lost to frictional force, energy is not conserved. Therefore-->

Ki - Kf = [tex]\Delta[/tex]K ---> K lost

Of course we'll be using K for rotational motion which =

(1/2)Iw^2 -->therefore --->

Ki = (1/2)I1 * w1i^2 -->no angular velocity on I2 so = 0 -->
Kf = (1/2)wf^2 * [I1 + I2]

(1/2)I1 * w1i^2 - (1/2)wf^2 * [I1 + I2] = [tex]\Lambda[/tex]K


Is this the right idea?
 
  • #13
You got it!
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
You got it!

yes, it's right. 20.6% change in K.

Doc, is it possible to solve this problem using a different method?

Such as Tau = I*alpha or using cirlcular motion equations?
 
  • #15
gills said:
Doc, is it possible to solve this problem using a different method?
This is by far the easiest way, since you don't have to know anything about the details of the forces between the two disks or the time it takes them to reach a common speed. (But you should be able to solve it by making up some generic assumptions about forces.)
 
  • #16
I am working on a very similar problem but am having trouble calculating the kinetic energy lost to friction. Is this just the change in kinetic energy? If so, my answer is off by 0.3% which is a lot for this particular problem.
 
  • #17
follow the steps i went through and you shouldn't have a problem getting that number. Don't round the significant figures toward the end, and you should get that number.

K_i - K_f = K_lost
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K