MHB Round-Trip Speed Word Problem: Sarah's Boat & River Current

AI Thread Summary
Sarah's boat travels at 15 km/h in still water and takes 4.5 hours for a round trip of 30 km upstream and downstream. To find the speed of the river current, the equations for time taken upstream and downstream are set up using the relationship between distance, speed, and time. By solving these equations, it is determined that the speed of the current is 5 km/h. The calculations confirm that the current's speed affects the total travel time, leading to this conclusion.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Round-Trip Speed Word Problem help?

I'm having trouble and been stuck for half an hour just trying and erasing and I need some help.

Question: In still water, Sarah's boat can travel 15 km/h. If it takes her a total of 4 1/2 hours to travel 30 km up a river and then to return by the same route, what is the speed of the current in the river?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Meh,

Let's break this down into the upstream portion of the trip and the downstream portion, using the relation distance equals speed times time. We will let $0<c$ be the speed of the current and $t_1$ be the time going upstream and $t_2$ be the time going downstream.

$$30=(15-c)t_1$$

$$30=(15+c)t_2$$

Now, we also know the total time is 4.5 hours, so we may state:

$$t_1+t_2=4.5\implies t_2=4.5-t_1$$

And so our second equation becomes:

$$30=(15+c)\left(4.5-t_1 \right)$$

Solving the first equation for $t_1$, we find:

$$t_1=\frac{30}{15-c}$$

Now, substituting this into our new second equation, we obtain an equation in one variable $c$, which is what we are trying to find:

$$30=(15+c)\left(4.5-\frac{30}{15-c} \right)$$

Multiplying through by $15-c$, we get:

$$30(15-c)=(15+c)\left(4.5(15-c)-30 \right)$$

Distribute on the right:

$$30(15-c)=(15+c)\left(67.5-4.5c-30 \right)$$

Combine like terms:

$$30(15-c)=(15+c)\left(37.5-4.5c \right)$$

Multiply through by $2$:

$$30(30-2c)=(15+c)\left(75-9c \right)$$

Distribute on both sides:

$$900-60c=1125-60c-9c^2$$

Combine like terms and arrange as:

$$9c^2=225$$

Divide through by $9$:

$$c^2=25$$

Take the positive root:

$$c=5$$

Thus, we conclude that the current in the river is $$5\,\frac{\text{km}}{\text{hr}}$$.
 

I'll solve this with one variable.

In still water, Sarah's boat can travel 15 km/hr.
If it takes her a total of 4 1/2 hours to travel 30 km
up a river and then to return by the same route,
what is the speed of the current in the river?
I will use: .\text{Time} \;=\;\frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Speed}}Let x = speed of the current.

Going upstream, her speed is 15-x km/hr.
To travel 30 km, it takes: .\tfrac{30}{15-x} hours.

Going downstream, her speed is 15+x km/hr.
To travel 30 km, it takes: .\tfrac{30}{15+x} hours.

Her total time is 4\!\tfrac{1}{2} hours.

. . \frac{30}{15-x} + \frac{30}{15+x} \:=\:\frac{9}{2}Multiply by 2(15-x)(15+x)\!:

. . \begin{array}{c}60(15+x) + 60(15-x) \:=\:9(15-x)(15+x) \\ \\ 900 + 60x + 900 - 60x \:=\:9(225-x^2) \\ \\ 1800 \:=\:2025 - 9x^2 \\ \\ 9x^2 \:=\:225 \\ \\ x^2 \:=\:25 \\ \\ x \:=\:5 \end{array}The speed of the current is 5 km/hr.​
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top