Row Reduction to solve for 6 Unknowns

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a system of equations involving six unknowns and three equations using row reduction techniques. The equations provided are: x4 + 2x5 - x6 = 2, x1 + 2x2 + x5 - x6 = 0, and x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 - x5 + x6 = 2. Participants conclude that while it is impossible to find unique solutions for all variables due to the excess of unknowns, it is feasible to express three variables in terms of the remaining three, indicating an infinite number of solutions. The key takeaway is that the system has free variables, allowing for multiple solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of row reduction techniques in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with systems of linear equations
  • Knowledge of free variables and their role in solution sets
  • Basic proficiency in matrix representation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of row reduction to echelon form in linear algebra
  • Learn about free variables and their implications in systems of equations
  • Explore the concept of independent equations and their impact on solution sets
  • Practice solving systems of equations with varying numbers of unknowns and equations
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus or linear algebra courses, educators teaching systems of equations, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of row reduction and solution sets in linear algebra.

Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I am in a calculus class where we are learning the introduction to row reduction. I have done this before in other courses, so I am familiar with the process, but I am not sure about this one. We were given:

x4 + 2x5- x6 = 2
x1 + 2x2 + x5 -x6 = 0
x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 - x5 + x6 = 2

We were supposed to: solve for each unknown or tell how many solutions this has(usually something like 0 or infinity).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



We haven't learned it exactly yet, but there is no real row eschelon form for this, is there? I don't know what all I can do mathematically, it just seems to me that we only have 3 equations and 6 unknowns, so we cannot possibly solve for this, right? Am I missing something here? I wrote out the matrix exactly as it is written (if it didn't state a variable, i set it to 0. e.g. in equation 1, it does not mention x1 through x3 so I made those 0).

No matter what you do, you have a 3x6 matrix with 3 equations and 6 unknowns.

Am I missing something here? How could I mathematically answer this question and not just state what I have stated above?

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just go ahead and row reduce it as far as you can. You can get rid of the ##x_1## in the middle equation with the last one, which will also get rid of the ##x_2## but that's OK. You should be able to get three rows whose first element is ##1##. Solve for those variables in terms of the others.
 
That's what I thought, thanks. So I have reduced it as far as I can, and it is obvious that you still cannot solve, so would an appropriate answer just be that there are No Solutions?
 
Yosty22 said:
That's what I thought, thanks. So I have reduced it as far as I can, and it is obvious that you still cannot solve, so would an appropriate answer just be that there are No Solutions?

I'm thinking you can likely solve for three of the variables in terms of the others, right? The extra variables are called free variables and can be anything. You have lots of solutions. The case when there would be no solutions is of one of your rows is all zeros and a nonzero on the right side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yosty22 said:
That's what I thought, thanks. So I have reduced it as far as I can, and it is obvious that you still cannot solve, so would an appropriate answer just be that there are No Solutions?
What do you mean by "cannot solve"? You cannot solve for a single specific value for each number but you didn't expect to, right? Part of the question was "how many solutions are there?"

You have three equations in six unknown values so if all three equations are independent you would expect to be able to solve for 6- 3= 3 of the values in terms of the other three.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
768
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
929
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K