Ryder QFT 2nd ed. page 341 misprint?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter melezmelez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    misprint Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misprint in Equation 9.124 of Ryder's QFT 2nd edition, specifically regarding the one-loop polarization tensor and its ultraviolet (UV) divergence. The first step of the equation yields a zero propagator as ε approaches zero, while the final step results in an infinite value due to the term proportional to 1/ε. This divergence necessitates a counter term for compensation, leading to photon-field renormalization. Ultimately, Ryder's method ensures that physical quantities are expressed in terms of finite dressed wave functions, masses, and couplings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with dimensional regularization techniques
  • Knowledge of one-loop polarization tensor calculations
  • Experience with renormalization concepts in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study dimensional regularization in detail
  • Learn about the one-loop polarization tensor and its implications
  • Research photon-field renormalization techniques
  • Review Ryder's QFT 2nd edition for additional context on misprints
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those preparing for exams or seeking to understand renormalization and dimensional regularization methods as presented in Ryder's textbook.

melezmelez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Eq. 9.124 has 3 steps. The first one gives 0 propagator for ε goes to 0. The final step, the one with Z gives infinity. Can anyone post the correct steps? Is there anything wrong in previews equations? It is important for me to learn the Ryder's book method. I have an exam in 10 days
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand, where you have a problem here. Of course, the one-loop polarization tensor (photon selfenergy) is UV divergent. In Ryder's regularization scheme (dimensional regularization) this manifests itself in the fact that there's a term [itex]\propto 1/\epsilon[/itex] which diverges for the physical value [itex]\epsilon \rightarrow 0[/itex]. Thus you need a counter term to compensate (at least) this divergency, and as Ryder nicely shows, this counter term leads to a photon-field renormalization. At the end everything is finite by expressing physical quantities in terms of the finite dressed wave functions, masses, and couplings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K