S.A.R.S Could this be the result of inbound Particles

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ranyart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothesis that the SARS virus may have extraterrestrial origins, potentially linked to particles or bacteria from comet impacts, particularly the recent impact on Jupiter. Participants explore the implications of interplanetary transfer of lifeforms and the role of upper atmospheric bacteria in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that upper atmospheric bacteria could be morphed with lifeforms from comet impacts, suggesting a possible connection to the emergence of the SARS virus.
  • Others question the feasibility of viruses evolving in space without a living host, arguing that it seems unlikely for a virus to be well-adapted to humans if it originated from extraterrestrial sources.
  • One participant challenges the notion that Earth is the only source of bacteria, suggesting that inbound particles from comet debris could carry bacteria that interact with Earth's upper atmosphere.
  • Another participant emphasizes the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial bacteria and argues that the theory lacks supporting data, proposing simpler explanations for the virus's origins.
  • A later reply references a claim by a researcher suggesting that life could be delivered to Earth via comets, aligning with the panspermia theory, but notes that mainstream scientists remain skeptical.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the idea of extraterrestrial origins for SARS, citing the improbability of a virus being virulent against humans without prior exposure.
  • There are mentions of ongoing debates regarding the potential for new bacterial strains to develop from molecular mixing due to cosmic interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the origins of SARS and the plausibility of extraterrestrial bacteria influencing life on Earth.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about the survival of bacteria in space and the mechanisms of viral transmission, which remain unresolved. The discussion includes references to theoretical frameworks like panspermia without definitive evidence supporting these claims.

  • #31
My bad, I meant that not all viruses require a living host to survive. Viruses like smallpox not only require a living host to produce the next generation but also to live. This is why we have completely eradicated small pox, because once everyone was vaccinated, it was unable mutate and died out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K