S. Martin's Supersymmetry primer Metric

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TriTertButoxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Supersymmetry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around S. Martin's Supersymmetry primer and the metric conventions used within it, specifically the mostly plus metric versus the mostly minus metric commonly used in particle physics. Participants express concerns about the implications of these conventions on understanding supersymmetry (SUSY) and seek alternatives or solutions for adapting to the differences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about Martin's use of a mostly plus metric, noting that it contrasts with the mostly minus metric used by particle physicists, which could lead to confusion.
  • Another participant points out that Martin has provided a method to convert the metric in his primer, suggesting a practical solution to the issue.
  • A participant highlights the importance of conventions in spinorial calculus for SUSY and recommends Mueller-Kirsten's book as a well-written introduction, although they note it does not cover advanced topics like MSSM and non-perturbative physics.
  • Another participant agrees with the value of Mueller-Kirsten's book but emphasizes the need for Martin's primer to delve into more complex subjects beyond the foundational setup.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the preference for metric conventions, as some express frustration with the mostly plus metric while others acknowledge the conversion method provided by Martin. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to reconcile these differences in metric conventions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of metric conventions in the context of SUSY and the potential challenges faced when transitioning from one convention to another, but do not resolve the implications of these conventions on the understanding of the material.

TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

S. Martin's Supersymmetry primer (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356) is a wonderful source from which to learn SUSY.

But, what really causes me (and others around me) huge consternation is Martin's use of mostly plus metric, when particle physicists use the mostly minus metric. Given that minus signs are very important in SUSY, it would be nice to follow a primer that is in line with particle physicist's metric.

Is there a mostly minus version of the primer?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NEVER MIND; Martin has provided the readers with a way to easily convert it:
Grab the source from the ArXiV, and change the following line in his tex file:

\def\signofmetric{1}
 
Well, the advantage is that it's a free source. Since spinorial calculul is the foundation of SuSy, such basic conventions do matter. If you're coming off a QFT book with the mostly minus convention, then you are not pleased. You have to do work on your own to adjust to the new convention. My reccomendation to anyone for the best written introduction to SuSy would be the book by Mueller-Kirsten. It leaves almost nothing to the reader.
 
I have Mueller-Kirsten's book. It is awesome; but they only go as far as setting up the machinery. Now I need to study MSSM and other non-perturbative physics. This is where Martin's primer comes in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K