S-matrix structure of the lightest particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of the S-matrix structure for the lightest particle, which cannot decay into other particles. It establishes that the T-matrix amplitude must be zero, leading to the conclusion that the self-energy \(\Pi(p^2=m^2)\) should also equal zero. However, it raises the question of the effects of choosing a different renormalization scheme where \(\Pi(p^2=m^2) \neq 0\), suggesting that this could lead to a non-unitary S-matrix. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of renormalizing the wave function and defines the physical mass of the particle through the pole of the single-particle propagator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of S-matrix and T-matrix concepts in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with self-energy and renormalization techniques
  • Knowledge of Feynman amplitudes and their role in particle interactions
  • Basic grasp of quantum numbers and particle decay processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of renormalization schemes in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the derivation and significance of the single-particle propagator
  • Explore the concept of unitarity in quantum mechanics and its mathematical formulations
  • Investigate the role of self-energy in particle physics and its calculation methods
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physicists analyzing decay processes, and researchers focused on the implications of renormalization in particle interactions.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
If you have a particle that is the lightest particle, then it cannot decay into other particles. As a consequence of this, its T-matrix amplitude on-shell should be zero, since the S-matrix is S=1+iT, and the amplitude for the particle to be found with the same quantum numbers and momentum is 1 since it can't decay, so T=0. The T-matrix in this case should be the self-energy of the particle. So you should always have \Pi(p^2=m^2)=0. But what if you choose a different renormalization scheme so that \Pi(p^2=m^2) \neq 0? Then the S-matrix doesn't seem like it can be equal to 1, since this is the lightest particle, so the T-matrix should always be real on-shell, so that S=1+imaginary number, and the amplitude of this is greater than 1.

Unitarity requires:

$$
- \text{Im} \, \Pi (i \leftarrow i)=\sum_n (2 \pi)^4 \delta^4(P_{ni})(\Pi_n \frac{1}{\rho^2})F (n \leftarrow i)^* F (n \leftarrow i)
$$

In this formula, n are all on-shell intermediate states of all possible particles, and \rho are normalization factors of these particles, and F are Feynman amplitudes. Since this is the lightest particle and can't decay, only when n=i, F \rightarrow -i \Pi(p^2=m^2) does the RHS contribute. This seems to imply that if the self-energy is not equal to zero on-shell, then the RHS is non-zero, so the imaginary part of the self-energy on the LHS can be non-zero on-shell. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, you also have to renormalize the wave function. The physical mass of the particle is always defined by the pole of the corresponding single-particle propagator (one-particle Green's function).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K