Calculation of S-matrix elements in quantum field theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of S-matrix elements in quantum field theory is primarily conducted perturbatively, as outlined in Matthew Schwartz's 'Introduction to Quantum Field Theory'. In a free theory, the S-matrix is represented as the identity matrix, with deviations described by the transfer matrix, denoted as ##\mathcal{T}##. The momentum-conserving delta function, ##\delta^{4}(\sum p)##, is crucial for ensuring that the initial and final states maintain the same total four-momentum. The discussion emphasizes the integration of the transfer matrix over space-time, leading to the formulation of matrix elements as ##\langle f|\mathcal{M}|i\rangle##, where ##\mathcal{M}## represents the non-trivial part of the S-matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of S-matrix formalism in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory and its applications
  • Knowledge of four-momentum conservation and delta functions
  • Basic concepts of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and field operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the S-matrix in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of the transfer matrix in perturbative calculations
  • Explore the implications of delta functions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the applications of QED in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and particle interactions will benefit from this discussion.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the following extract taken from page 60 of Matthew Schwartz's 'Introduction to Quantum Field Theory':We usually calculate ##S##-matrix elements perturbatively. In a free theory, where there are no interactions, the ##S##-matrix is simply the identity matrix ##\mathbb{1}##. We can therefore write ##S=\mathbb{1}+i\mathcal{T}##, where ##\mathcal{T}## is called the transfer matrix and describes deviations from the free theory. Since the ##S##-matrix should vanish unless the initial and final states have the same total ##4##-momentum, it is helpful to factor an overall momentum-conserving ##\delta##-function: ##\mathcal{T}=(2\pi)^{4}\delta^{4}(\sum p)\mathcal{M}##. Here, ##\delta^{4}(\sum p)## is shorthand for ##\delta^{4}(\sum p^{\mu}_{i} - \sum p^{\mu}_{f})##, where ##p^{\mu}_{i}## are the initial particles' momenta and ##p^{\mu}_{f}## are the final particles' momenta. In this way, we can focus on computing the non-trivial part of the ##S##-matrix, ##\mathcal{M}##. In quantum field theory, "matrix elements" usually means ##\langle f|\mathcal{M}|i\rangle##. Thus we have

$$\langle f|S-\mathbb{1}|i\rangle = i(2\pi)^{4}\delta^{4}(\sum p)\langle f|\mathcal{M}|i\rangle.$$

Now, it might seem worrisome at first that we need to take the square of a quantity with a ##\delta##-function. However, this is actually simple to deal with. When integrated over, one of the delta functions in the square is sufficient to enforce the desired condition; the remaining ##\delta##-function will always be non-zero and formally infinite, but with our finite time and volume will give ##\delta^{4}(0)=\frac{TV}{(2\pi)^{4}}##. For ##|f\rangle \neq |i\rangle## (the case ##|f\rangle = |i\rangle##, for which nothing happens, is special),

$$|\langle f|S|i\rangle |^{2}=\delta^{4}(0)\delta^{4}(\sum p)(2\pi)^{8}|\langle f|\mathcal{M}|i\rangle|^{2} = \delta^{4}(\sum p)TV(2\pi)^{4}|\mathcal{M}|^{2},$$

where ##| \mathcal{M} |^{2} \equiv | \langle f | \mathcal{M} | i \rangle |^{2}.##
Why can we factor out the momentum-conserving delta function? Are we integrating the transfer matrix ##\mathcal{T}## over the some integration variable so that the delta function helps to conserve the ##4##-momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy-momentum conserving delta function results from the space-time integration in the S-matrix expansion S = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} S^{(n)} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-i)^{n}}{n!} \int d^{4}x_{1} \cdots d^{4}x_{n} \ T \big \{ \mathcal{H}_{I}(x_{1}) \cdots \mathcal{H}_{I}(x_{n}) \big \} . For QED
\mathcal{H}_{I}(x) = -e N \big \{ \bar{\psi}(x) \gamma^{\mu}\psi (x) A_{\mu}(x) \big \} .
Expanding the field operators in terms of positive and negative frequency modes, and doing the normal ordering, we obtain
<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \mathcal{H}(x) =&amp; -e \left[ \bar{\psi}^{+}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{+} + \bar{\psi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{-} + \bar{\psi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{+} - \psi^{-}_{b}\gamma^{\mu}_{ab}\bar{\psi}^{+}_{a} \right] A^{+}_{\mu} \\<br /> &amp; - e \left[ \bar{\psi}^{+}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{+} + \bar{\psi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{-} + \bar{\psi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{+} - \psi^{-}_{b}\gamma^{\mu}_{ab}\bar{\psi}^{+}_{a} \right] A^{-}_{\mu} .<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />
The first line contains the four elementary processes of photon-absorption, whereas the terms in the second line represent \gamma-emission. These are not real physical processes because they don’t conserve both energy and momentum for physical photons k^{2} = 0, and fermions p^{2} = m^{2}. Nevertheless, we can use them to see where the delta function comes from. Let us consider the pair creation process \gamma (\mathbf{k} , l ) \to e^{-}(\mathbf{p_{1}} , s) e^{+}(\mathbf{p_{2}}, r) . So, we have | i \rangle = | \gamma ; \mathbf{k} , l \rangle = a^{\dagger}_{l}(\mathbf{k}) | 0 \rangle , | f \rangle = | e^{-}; \mathbf{p_{1}}, s \rangle | e^{+}; \mathbf{p_{2}} , r \rangle = c^{\dagger}_{s}(\mathbf{p_{1}}) d^{\dagger}_{r}(\mathbf{p_{2}}) | 0 \rangle .
Thus, the matrix element for this first-order process is given by
\langle f | S^{(1)} | i \rangle = i e \int d^{4}x \ \langle 0 | c_{s}(\mathbf{p}_{1}) d_{r}(\mathbf{p}_{2}) \bar{\psi}^{-}(x) \gamma^{\mu} \psi^{-}(x) A^{+}_{\mu}(x) a^{\dagger}_{l}(\mathbf{k}) | 0 \rangle .
Now, I leave you to do the rest. Just substitute the following expansions, and use the anti-commutation relations for the fermionic operators, c , c^{\dagger} , d and d^{\dagger}, and the commutation relations for the bosonic operators, a^{\dagger} and a, to get rid of all operators and the vacuum state
\bar{ \psi }^{-}(x) = \sum_{\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{1} , \bar{s}} \left( \frac{m}{V E( \bar{\mathbf{p}}_{1} )} \right)^{1/2} c^{\dagger}_{\bar{s}}(\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{1}) \ \bar{u}_{\bar{s}}(\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{1}) \ e^{i \bar{p}_{1}x } ,
\psi^{-}(x) = \sum_{\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{2} , \bar{r}} \left( \frac{m}{V E(\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{2})} \right)^{1/2} d^{\dagger}_{\bar{r}}(\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{2}) \ v_{\bar{r}}(\bar{\mathbf{p}}_{2}) \ e^{i \bar{p}_{2}x } .
A^{+}_{\mu}(x) = \sum_{\bar{\mathbf{k}} , \bar{l}} \left( \frac{1}{2V \omega (\bar{\mathbf{k}})} \right)^{1/2} \epsilon_{\mu}(\bar{\mathbf{k}};\bar{l}) \ a_{\bar{l}} (\bar{\mathbf{k}}) \ e^{- i \bar{k}x} .
Then, do the x-integration to obtain the delta function. The final result should look like
\langle f | S^{(1)} | i \rangle = \left( \frac{m}{V E(\mathbf{p}_{1})} \right)^{1/2} \left( \frac{m}{V E(\mathbf{p}_{2})} \right)^{1/2} \left( \frac{1}{2V \omega (\mathbf{k})} \right)^{1/2} \ (4\pi)^{4} \delta^{4}( p_{1} + p_{2} - k ) \ \mathcal{M} , where
\mathcal{M} = i e \ \bar{u} (\mathbf{p}_{1}; s) \gamma^{\mu} \epsilon_{\mu} (\mathbf{k}; l ) v (\mathbf{p}_{2}; r ) .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jeeves

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K