Sachs and Wu's General Relativity for Mathematicians

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by users studying "General Relativity for Mathematicians" by Sachs and Wu, particularly regarding the exercises in the book. Participants emphasize the importance of posting specific questions along with their attempts in forums like Advanced Physics Homework Help for effective assistance. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding concepts such as the mapping of real numbers to two-dimensional space and the differentiation of functions, as demonstrated in the user's attempt at Exercise 0.2.1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, specifically mappings and differentiations.
  • Familiarity with LaTeX for formatting mathematical expressions.
  • Knowledge of the fundamentals of general relativity as presented in Sachs and Wu's text.
  • Experience with problem-solving in advanced physics contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the solutions to exercises in "General Relativity for Mathematicians" by Sachs and Wu.
  • Learn advanced differentiation techniques in the context of differential geometry.
  • Research the use of LaTeX for presenting mathematical proofs and solutions.
  • Engage with online forums dedicated to advanced physics problem-solving for collaborative learning.
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in mathematics and physics, educators teaching general relativity, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of advanced mathematical concepts in physics.

Avogadro Number
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
I am trying to study "religiously" the book by Sachs and Wu, but I am finding the Exercises very much of a challenge. Does anyone know if there exists a source for solutions one can consult when stuck?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't really "do" solution manuals here, but if you post the question and your working (you may need to read the LaTeX guide linked below the reply box if you don't know LaTeX) we'll be happy to help. That's one reason we're here. Technically, you should probably post in the Advanced Physics Homework Help forum, but mentors seem to be a bit more relaxed about graduate level exercises in the technical forums and they probably won't disintegrate you if you put it in the wrong place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte and Avogadro Number
Apologies about posting this in the wrong channel. Thanks for the tip.
 
I have made an attempt at this exercise: Is the following alright?:

If we take ##\mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, and ##\gamma:\mathcal{E}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2## defined by ## \gamma u= (x(au),au),## for ##u\in \mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##,
then ##\gamma_*u=a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2}##. This gives:
(a) ##du^2(\gamma_* u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2})(u^2)=0+a\cdot 1=a,##
(b) ##\gamma^1(u)=x(au)=x(\gamma^2 u)=(x\circ \gamma^2)## for all real ##u##, and
(c) ##g(\gamma_* u,\gamma_* u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2-(a)^2=a^2[(\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2-1^2]=a^2\cdot 0=0.##
##\phantom{(c)}##Here we have used ##v=|\frac{dx}{du}|=1## everywhere.

I haven't yet tried showing uniqueness of ##\mathcal{E}## and ##\gamma##.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
I tried several years ago to read from it.
Got stuck on one question, and didn't proceed from there.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/61298/ex-0-2-1-in-sachs-and-wus-textbook

I see it's from an old computer my brother always promised to fix it (and didn't).
I have made an attempt at this exercise: Is the following alright?:

If we take ##\mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, and ##\gamma:\mathcal{E}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2## defined by ##\gamma u=(x(au),au)##, for ##u\in \mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, then ##\gamma_∗ u=a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2}##. This gives:

(a) ##du^2(\gamma_∗u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2})(u^2)=0+a⋅1=a##,

(b) ##\gamma^1(u)=x(au)=x(\gamma^2 u)=(x\circ \gamma^2)(u)## for all real ##u##, and

(c) ##g(\gamma_∗u,\gamma_∗u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2−(a)^2=a^2[(\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2−1^2]=a^2⋅0=0##. Here we have used ##v=|\frac{dx}{du}|=1## everywhere.

I haven't yet tried showing uniqueness of ##\mathcal{E}## and ##\gamma##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K