Sachs and Wu's General Relativity for Mathematicians

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by participants while studying the book "General Relativity for Mathematicians" by Sachs and Wu, particularly focusing on the exercises presented in the text. Participants seek assistance with specific problems and share their attempts at solving exercises, highlighting the complexity of the material.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty with the exercises in Sachs and Wu's book and inquires about available solution sources.
  • Another participant suggests posting specific questions along with their work for community assistance, noting the appropriate forum for such inquiries.
  • A participant shares their past experience of getting stuck on a question from the book and provides a link to a related discussion on another platform.
  • One participant presents their attempt at an exercise, detailing their mathematical reasoning and calculations involving mappings and metrics, while also indicating they have not yet addressed the uniqueness of the elements involved.
  • A repeated post from the same participant reiterates their earlier points and attempts, emphasizing their struggle with the material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the solutions to the exercises, as participants are sharing individual attempts and challenges without resolving the difficulties presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not provided complete solutions or resolved the mathematical steps necessary for the exercises, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the material.

Avogadro Number
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
I am trying to study "religiously" the book by Sachs and Wu, but I am finding the Exercises very much of a challenge. Does anyone know if there exists a source for solutions one can consult when stuck?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't really "do" solution manuals here, but if you post the question and your working (you may need to read the LaTeX guide linked below the reply box if you don't know LaTeX) we'll be happy to help. That's one reason we're here. Technically, you should probably post in the Advanced Physics Homework Help forum, but mentors seem to be a bit more relaxed about graduate level exercises in the technical forums and they probably won't disintegrate you if you put it in the wrong place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte and Avogadro Number
Apologies about posting this in the wrong channel. Thanks for the tip.
 
I have made an attempt at this exercise: Is the following alright?:

If we take ##\mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, and ##\gamma:\mathcal{E}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2## defined by ## \gamma u= (x(au),au),## for ##u\in \mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##,
then ##\gamma_*u=a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2}##. This gives:
(a) ##du^2(\gamma_* u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2})(u^2)=0+a\cdot 1=a,##
(b) ##\gamma^1(u)=x(au)=x(\gamma^2 u)=(x\circ \gamma^2)## for all real ##u##, and
(c) ##g(\gamma_* u,\gamma_* u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2-(a)^2=a^2[(\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2-1^2]=a^2\cdot 0=0.##
##\phantom{(c)}##Here we have used ##v=|\frac{dx}{du}|=1## everywhere.

I haven't yet tried showing uniqueness of ##\mathcal{E}## and ##\gamma##.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
I tried several years ago to read from it.
Got stuck on one question, and didn't proceed from there.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/61298/ex-0-2-1-in-sachs-and-wus-textbook

I see it's from an old computer my brother always promised to fix it (and didn't).
I have made an attempt at this exercise: Is the following alright?:

If we take ##\mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, and ##\gamma:\mathcal{E}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2## defined by ##\gamma u=(x(au),au)##, for ##u\in \mathcal{E}=\mathbb{R}##, then ##\gamma_∗ u=a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2}##. This gives:

(a) ##du^2(\gamma_∗u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au)\partial_{u^1}+a\partial_{u^2})(u^2)=0+a⋅1=a##,

(b) ##\gamma^1(u)=x(au)=x(\gamma^2 u)=(x\circ \gamma^2)(u)## for all real ##u##, and

(c) ##g(\gamma_∗u,\gamma_∗u)=(a\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2−(a)^2=a^2[(\frac{dx}{du}(au))^2−1^2]=a^2⋅0=0##. Here we have used ##v=|\frac{dx}{du}|=1## everywhere.

I haven't yet tried showing uniqueness of ##\mathcal{E}## and ##\gamma##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
784
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K