Sakurai Problems - strange notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Chapter 1 of Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics," specifically regarding the notation and interpretation of a 2x2 matrix expressed in terms of a scalar and the Pauli matrices. Participants express confusion about the notation and the assumptions made in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of adding a scalar to a matrix and seek clarification on the notation of the Pauli matrices. Some suggest that the notation implies a broader mathematical context where the Pauli matrices serve as a basis for 2x2 complex-valued matrices.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and previous experiences with similar questions. Some have provided insights into the notation, while others express uncertainty about the assumptions made in the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern that the Pauli matrices were not explicitly defined in the early chapters of the book, leading to confusion among participants regarding their use in the problem.

Hargoth
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I'm just doing the Problems of Chapter 1 of Sakurai: Modern Quantum Mechanics. On page 60, problem 2 he writes:

"Suppose a 2x2 matrix X, (not necessary Hermitian, nor unitary) is written as

X = a_0 + \mathbf{\sigma \cdot a},

where a_0 and a_{1,2,3} are numbers."

which confuses me a bit, because you can't add a number and a matrix, and what is \sigma anyway? Would be nice if someone knows what is meant by this (and tells me :biggrin: ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure he means that \vec{\sigma} is a short name for the Pauli matrices and a_{0} is multiplied by the 2*2 unit matrix.

Daniel.
 
dexter is correct. I was confused with this problem too and actually asked the same question about it here some time ago.
 
Thanks.:smile:

That \mathbf{\sigma} is one of the Pauli-Matrices seems strange to me from the context of the book, because he never defined this during the first chapter. Nevertheless, I'll try to figure it out this way.
 
I think you're just supposed to take the sigmas abstractly as some 2x2 (complex-valued) matrices such that any 2x2 (complex-valued) matrix can be written as

X = a_0 I + \mathbf{\sigma \cdot a}

with no assumptions about the form of the \mathbf{\sigma}s. In math speak, the \mathbf{\sigma}s together with I are some basis for the vector space of 2x2 complex-valued matrices.
 
Last edited:
Eh, now that I try to actually do the problem, I think he (or the editor) is just assuming you know the Pauli matrices from undergrad QM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K