Same chapters from Griffiths being used for EM1 and EM2?

  • Thread starter Ghost117
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Griffiths
In summary, there are two courses in MIT's opencourseware, Electromagnetism 1 and 2, which use the same textbook and cover the same chapters, despite being from different years and possibly having different instructors. This is similar to the situation at UofT where the same textbook is used for multiple calculus courses, but not necessarily in the same order. It is possible that the second course is reviewing material from the first course, or that the courses have been structured differently. It is also noted that the 2006 course covers more material than the 2014 course and has different prerequisites. This may indicate a shift in emphasis towards a different textbook.
  • #1
Ghost117
50
3
Hi everyone, I'm looking at MIT's opencourseware as a template. It seems the same textbook was used for Electromagnetism 1 and 2, even the same chapters, which seems really odd.

For example, both EM 1 (in 2006) and EM 2 (current year 2014) studied Vector Analysis and Electrostatics from the first 2 chapters of Griffiths... What's going on here? Why is EM 2 covering the same stuff as EM 1, from the same textbook no less?

Compare the readings of EM1 from 2006, using Griffiths 3rd edition
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/readings/

To the course outline of EM 2 from 2014, using Griffiths 4th edition
http://web.mit.edu/8.07/www/geninfo/inf1-f14.pdf

In UofT, for calculus 1A and 1B we used the same textbook (Stewart), but not the same chapters obviously. The same book is even used for Calc II, but it continues forward from Chapter 10...

So this isn't making any sense to me, apparently EM 2 is restudying the same stuff from EM 1...p.s. I just checked, even the rest of the chapters are the same! EM1 from 2006 is actually covering more material then EM 2 today
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The two courses are from different years, and likely from different instructors. They may have structured the courses in different ways.

It's also possible that they felt a brief review of the first two chapters would be helpful for the second semester of E&M.
 
  • #3
But the same chapters are covered throughout the two courses... Actually, EM1 covers more stuff then EM 2 now apparently... EM1 goes up to Chapter 12, giving an intro to GR and QM which EM 2 doesn't even touch...

this is really wierd...
 
  • #4
You can always drop an e-mail to the instructor (of the 2014 course, of course) and ask him about the change of content: LECTURER: Alan H. Guth, Room 6-322, 617-253-6265, guth@ctp.mit.edu
 
  • #5
The class topics in 2006
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/readings/
are easier than those from 2014
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-07-electromagnetism-ii-fall-2012/calendar/
and the prequisites from 2006
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/syllabus/
are less than those from 2014
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-07-electromagnetism-ii-fall-2012/Syllabus/
so 2006 is more Purcell than Griffiths (but leaning in Griffiths direction) and 2014 is more Griffiths than Jackson (but leaning in Jackson's direction).
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

1. Why are the same chapters from Griffiths used for both EM1 and EM2?

One reason is that the topics covered in these chapters are fundamental to the study of electromagnetism and are essential for understanding more advanced topics. Using the same chapters ensures that all students have a strong foundation in these concepts before moving on to more complex material.

2. Are there any differences in how the chapters are taught in EM1 and EM2?

While the same chapters may be used, there may be differences in how the material is taught in each class. This can vary depending on the instructor and the specific curriculum of the course. However, the core concepts and content of the chapters remain the same.

3. Will students get bored if they have to cover the same material twice?

It is possible that some students may find the repetition of material to be tedious. However, reviewing and reinforcing concepts is an important aspect of learning and can help improve understanding and retention of the material.

4. Can students skip over the chapters they have already covered in EM1?

It is not recommended to skip over material that has been covered in a previous course. This can result in gaps in understanding and make it difficult to follow along with more advanced topics. It is important to have a strong foundation in all the material before moving on to more complex concepts.

5. Is there any benefit to using the same textbook for both EM1 and EM2?

Using the same textbook for both courses can be beneficial as it allows for continuity in learning and can help students make connections between different concepts. It also ensures that all students are on the same page and have access to the same resources. However, different textbooks may also be used in conjunction with the same chapters from Griffiths.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
27K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top