According to your terse problem statement they ask for the average reisistance during its flight.BvU said:
Satellite resistance, also known as retarding force, is a force that acts on a satellite in orbit, slowing it down and causing it to lose altitude over time. This force is primarily caused by atmospheric drag, but can also be influenced by other factors such as solar radiation pressure and gravitational effects from other celestial bodies.
Satellite resistance causes a satellite's orbit to gradually decay and become more elliptical. This means that the satellite's altitude decreases and its speed decreases, resulting in a change in the shape and size of its orbit. If not corrected, satellite resistance can eventually cause a satellite to re-enter Earth's atmosphere and burn up.
Yes, satellite resistance can be predicted and accounted for by using mathematical models and simulations. Scientists and engineers use data on atmospheric conditions, the satellite's orbit, and other factors to calculate the expected amount of resistance and make adjustments to the satellite's trajectory if necessary.
Satellites can counteract resistance by using thrusters or other propulsion systems to maintain their desired orbit. They can also use drag-inducing devices such as solar sails or deployable aerodynamic surfaces to reduce their speed and counteract the effects of resistance. In some cases, satellites may also be designed with a higher mass or a more streamlined shape to reduce the effects of atmospheric drag.
Satellite resistance can significantly affect the lifespan of a satellite. The more resistance a satellite experiences, the faster its orbit will decay and the shorter its lifespan will be. This is why satellite operators must carefully monitor and account for resistance when designing and operating their satellites to ensure they have a sufficient lifespan to carry out their intended mission.