MHB Sava's question via email about matrix multiplication

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the products of the matrix A with its transpose, AAT and ATA. The calculation of AAT results in 25I, indicating that A is invertible. It is suggested that the inverse of A can be expressed as A⁻¹ = (1/25)A^T. The need to verify that ATA also equals 25I is mentioned, confirming the inverse relationship. The conclusion is that if both products yield 25I, the proposed inverse is valid.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Given the matrix $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A = \left[ \begin{matrix} 3 & 0 & -4 \\ 4 & 0 & \phantom{-}3 \\ 0 & 5 & \phantom{-}0 \end{matrix}\right] \end{align*}$ evaluate $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A\,A^T \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^T\,A \end{align*}$. Hence write down $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^{-1} \end{align*}$.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A\,A^T &= \left[\begin{matrix} 3 & 0 & -4 \\ 4 & 0 & \phantom{-}3 \\ 0 & 5 & \phantom{-}0 \end{matrix}\right]\left[ \begin{matrix} \phantom{-}3 & 4 & 0 \\ \phantom{-}0 & 0 & 5 \\ -4 & 3 & 0 \end{matrix}\right] \\ &= \left[ \begin{matrix} 3\cdot 3 + 0 \cdot 0 + \left( -4 \right) \cdot \left( -4 \right) & 3 \cdot 4 + 0 \cdot 0 + \left( -4 \right) \cdot 3 & 3 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot 5 + \left( -4 \right) \cdot 0 \\ 4 \cdot 3 + 0 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot \left( -4 \right) & 4 \cdot 4 + 0 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 3 & 4\cdot 0 + 0 \cdot 5 + 3 \cdot 0 \\ 0 \cdot 3 + 5 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot \left( -4 \right) & 0 \cdot 4 + 5 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot 3 & 0 \cdot 0 + 5 \cdot 5 + 0 \cdot 0 \end{matrix} \right] \\ &= \left[ \begin{matrix} 25 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 25 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 25 \end{matrix} \right] \\ &= 25\,I \end{align*}$

Since post-multiplying $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A \end{align*}$ by $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^T \end{align*}$ gave $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 25\,I \end{align*}$, it suggests that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^{-1} = \frac{1}{25}\,A^T \end{align*}$.

Of course, we must also check that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^T\,A = 25\,I \end{align*}$ as well. This can be left to the OP/Reader. IF this is the case, then $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A^{-1} = \frac{1}{25}\,A^T \end{align*}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top