Scalar Field Theory-Vacuum Expectation Value

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the vacuum expectation value of a squared average field operator in the context of a quantized, neutral scalar field theory. The original poster has provided an equation and is seeking assistance with the integral involved in the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster has attempted part (a) of the problem and is now looking for guidance on part (b), specifically regarding the integral that must be squared to find the expectation value. Some participants suggest switching to spherical coordinates and adjusting the integral measure accordingly. Others discuss the form of the integral and the implications of the spatial and time components in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing suggestions for reformulating the integral and discussing the integration process. There is a focus on clarifying the setup and ensuring the correct form of the integrals is used, but no consensus has been reached on the solution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has indicated that they are unsure about the integral's solution and the implications of squaring the result. There are references to specific mathematical forms and techniques, such as the use of gamma functions, but the discussion remains open-ended without definitive conclusions.

Mick83
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given an equation for a quantized, neutral scalar field expanded in creation and destruction operators, and need to find the vacuum expectation value of a defined average field operator, squared. See attached pdf.


Homework Equations


Everything is attached, but I can include more.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've solved part (a) (I think- if someone could check my work it would be appreciated), so I need some idea on how to do part (b). The question clearly asks for the expectation of the squared value, but I don't have a clue how to solve the integral in the first place, which must then be squared to find the expectation value.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
switch to spherical coordinates... put your z axis toward the direction of k i.e. measure your \theta angle from k. don't forget to use the correct integral measure...
 
So use [tex]k_{\mu}=\bigg(\mathbf{k},\frac{i\omega}{c}\bigg),~~ x_{\mu}=(\mathbf{x},ict),~~ <br /> \mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}=k_{\mu}x_{\mu}-\omega t=k_1x_1+k_2x_2+k_3x_3-\omega t<br /> =kr(\sin\theta \cos\phi +\sin\theta \sin\phi +\cos\theta)-\omega t[/tex]? Regardless of the θ or ∅ dependence, [tex]\int^{\infty}_0 dr~r^2~ e^{r^2/2b}~e^{ikr}[/tex] gives a horrible result, even when squared.
 
nono that is not correct.
The kx in the power of the exponential is already only the 3-part of them. the expression is not in a "covariant" form, but the usual separate spatial and time parts.

So If you put your z axis towards the direction of k, and measure the angle \theta from there your integral will be:

[tex]\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_0^{\infty}dr \, r^2 e^{-r^2/2b^2} \int_{-1}^{1}d\cos{\theta} e^{ikr\cos\theta}[/tex]The theta part can be integrated easily.

U will get the kind of integral wt you wrote:

[tex]\int_0^{\infty}dr\, r^2 e^{-r^2/2b^2}e^{\pm ikr}[/tex]

now try bringing the integrand into the form:[itex]r^2e^{-ax^2}[/itex] i.e. complete the square on the exponentials. this kind of integral can be simply expressed with gamma functions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K