billtodd
- 136
- 33
Is there something beyond Holors?

The discussion revolves around the concept of holors and whether there are mathematical structures that extend beyond them. Participants explore various mathematical objects such as tensors, multivectors, and hypermatrices, and consider their properties and implications in different contexts, including geometric algebra and category theory.
Participants express differing views on the validity and utility of AI-generated information, with some advocating for traditional references while others explore advanced mathematical concepts. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the nature of holors or what may extend beyond them.
Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and properties of holors and related mathematical structures. The discussion includes references to advanced topics that may require specialized knowledge and does not resolve the complexities involved.
I have no idea what holors are, but the rest of your list is all tensors. So your question is actually: Is there something beyond tensors? Simple answer: everything that isn't linear.billtodd said:Is there something beyond Holors?
![]()
I heard of the book by Lasenby, but never found the time to read it.FactChecker said:There are different mathematical properties associated with a your list of objects, so it is difficult to know what direction of "beyond" you are asking about. I have been interested lately in the multivectors and n-vectors of Geometric Algebra.

AI is one of the worst things you can ask when it comes to science. It sells you the illusion of an answer without actually answering anything. Even Wikipedia is a far better reference. AIs make terribly lousy mistakes and don't understand a thing. I really recommend not using them.billtodd said:The bot suggests
And AI can not even weed out other AI-generated results on the internet. AI results will become like the secret that gets passed around in a circle and ends up vastly distorted.fresh_42 said:AI is one of the worst things you can ask when it comes to science. It sells you the illusion of an answer without actually answering anything. Even Wikipedia is a far better reference. AIs make terribly lousy mistakes and don't understand a thing. I really recommend not using them.
There is a reason why we use textbooks!
And by the way require them as valid references versus "something on the internet".
Have you heard of holors before?FactChecker said:And AI can not even weed out other AI-generated results on the internet. AI results will become like the secret that gets passed around in a circle and ends up vastly distorted.