Sceptisim & debunking forum very polictical

  • Thread starter Thread starter username
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the Scepticism & Debunking Forum for failing to effectively debunk cutting-edge scientific theories, instead devolving into politically charged rhetoric. Participants express frustration over perceived suppression of logical discourse and the prevalence of abusive language, leading to moderation actions. The conversation highlights the challenge of separating personal beliefs from scientific discussions, with members calling for a return to reasoned debate and emotional intelligence in discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of forum moderation policies and community guidelines
  • Familiarity with the concept of scientific skepticism
  • Knowledge of political biases in scientific discourse
  • Awareness of the impact of personal beliefs on scientific discussions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective forum moderation techniques to maintain constructive discussions
  • Explore the role of political bias in scientific debates
  • Study the principles of scientific skepticism and its application in public discourse
  • Investigate emotional intelligence strategies for managing heated discussions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for forum moderators, participants in scientific discourse, and individuals interested in the intersection of politics and science. It provides insights into maintaining civility and reason in discussions surrounding controversial topics.

  • #31
Reno and Las Vegas?? um you think the dam turbines stop for the night?

Yes conservation is low hanging fruit but you could think of better examples. like building retrofits in oil dependent economies - the tech is there. Right NOW.
Nuclear...
Typical knee jerk anti-nuke - coal releases far more radiation in the environment amongst other poisons so lets' put paid to the genetic nonsense.

Marginal nations cannot afford nukes and solar makes far more sense than long scale nuclear for them - they contribute almost nothing to the carbon problem - it's a completely ideological red herring.

70% of France, 50% of Ontario, 16% of the world, electricity comes from nukes - if you are anti-nukes at this stage in the carbon issue I suggest
a) reading
b) growing up

It's only one part of the solution to get to carbon neutral and breeder reactors are required to dispose of plutonium based weapons.

Small 40 year power units are coming for communities and these are ideal solutions.

Tom
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
570
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K