Schlaefli integral satisfies Legendre equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenkeiths
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Legendre
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Schlaefli integral representation of Legendre functions, defined as P_\nu(z) = \oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu}{(w-z)^{\nu+1}} dw, satisfies Legendre's equation through specific manipulations of its derivatives. The first and second derivatives are given by P'_\nu(z) and P''_\nu(z), respectively, leading to a complex expression that must be shown to equal zero. By substituting the derivatives into the equation and applying Cauchy's theorem, it is established that the integral vanishes when ν is an integer, contingent upon careful contour selection for non-integer values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly contour integration
  • Familiarity with Legendre functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of differential equations, specifically Legendre's equation
  • Proficiency in manipulating integrals and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Legendre functions and their integral representations
  • Learn about Cauchy's theorem and its applications in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of integer vs. non-integer values of ν in Legendre's equation
  • Investigate advanced techniques in contour integration for complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced studies of differential equations and complex analysis, particularly those focusing on special functions like Legendre functions.

stephenkeiths
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
The integral representation of Legendre functions is P_\nu(z) = \oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu}{(w-z)^{\nu+1}} dw. I'm trying to show that this satisfies Legendre's equation. When I take the derivatives and plug it into the equation, I just get a nasty expression with nasty integrals times functions of z. I don't see how I can combine any of the terms, since they have different powers of z, and all the integrals look different.

P'_\nu(z) = \oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu(\nu+1)}{(w-z)^{\nu+2}} dw
and
P''_\nu(z) = \oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu(\nu+1)(\nu+2)}{(w-z)^{\nu+3}} dw
So the expression is
(1-z^2)\oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu(\nu+1)(\nu+2)}{(w-z)^{\nu+3}} dw<br /> -2z \oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu(\nu+1)}{(w-z)^{\nu+2}} dw<br /> +\nu(\nu+1)\oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2-1)^\nu}{(w-z)^{\nu+1}} dw<br />
Which I need to somehow show is equal to zero. I tried to collect all the integrals together, hoping they would combine together to give me a nice term. At first I was hoping it would give me \frac{d}{dw} of the integrand, so I could just use Cauchy's theorem to show that the integral is zero. But the terms didn't seam to collect that way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your guess was correct, you get a derivative inside the integral. Just substitute in the differential equations and arrange terms:

<br /> (1-z^2)\frac{d^2 P_\nu(z)}{d z^2} - 2z\frac{d P_\nu(z)}{dz} + \nu(\nu +1)P_\nu(z) = (\nu + 1)\oint_{\Gamma} \frac{(w^2 -1)^\nu}{(w-z)^{\nu + 3}}(-(\nu+2)(w^2 -1) + 2(\nu + 1)w(w-z)) d\,w,<br />
which equals

(\nu +1)\oint_{\Gamma} \frac{d}{dw}\left( \frac{(w^2 - 1)^{\nu +1}}{(w-z)^{\nu +2}} \right) d\,w.

When \nu is an integer, this equals zero. Otherwise you have too be a little bit careful with the contour.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
947
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K