Schrodinger equation for close and opens system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the Schrödinger equation solutions for closed and open systems, exploring the implications of using density matrices versus wave functions, and the dynamics involved in each case.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Schrödinger equation remains the same for both closed and open systems, but the approach to solving it differs, with density matrices being used for open systems.
  • Others argue that the term "Schrödinger equation" should be specifically reserved for closed systems, emphasizing that these systems exhibit unitary dynamics without dissipation or decoherence.
  • One participant notes that the time evolution of the density matrix is governed by the Liouville-von Neumann equation, suggesting that this is a key distinction in the treatment of open systems.
  • It is proposed that open systems can also be approximated using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian within the Schrödinger equation framework, leading to non-unitary evolution of the wave function.
  • Another participant points out that using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian results in dissipation but not decoherence, and emphasizes that pure states remain pure under the von Neumann equation.
  • There is a suggestion that to fully account for effects in open systems, more general dynamical equations like the Lindblad equation should be used, as it includes terms that induce both dissipation and decoherence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability and terminology of the Schrödinger equation in the context of open versus closed systems, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining the Schrödinger equation's applicability, the role of different mathematical frameworks (density matrices, Liouville-von Neumann equation, non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Lindblad equation), and the assumptions underlying each approach.

brajeshbeec
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do we differentiate the solution of Schrödinger equation for closed and open system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

The Schrödinger equation is the same. But for an open system, you have to solve it using the density matrix, whereas for a closed system you usually can solve it for the wave function itself.
 
DrClaude said:
The Schrödinger equation is the same. But for an open system, you have to solve it using the density matrix [...]
I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.
 
kith said:
I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.

I'm not sure that I agree with you, but I did misspeak in my previous post. The time evolution of density matrix is governed by the Liouville-von Neumann equation
$$
i \hbar \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \left[ \hat{H}, \rho \right]
$$
That said, you can also approximate an open system using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and use that in the Schrödinger equation, and have a non-unitary evolution of the wave function.
 
DrClaude said:
That said, you can also approximate an open system using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and use that in the Schrödinger equation, and have a non-unitary evolution of the wave function.
True, I didn't think about this. But you will only get dissipation with this, not decoherence. This doesn't change if you use the von Neumann equation (which is derived from the Schrödinger equation). Pure states are still mapped to pure states and the entropy doesn't change.

In order to take into account all effects in open systems you need more general dynamical equations like the Lindblad equation. Compared with the von Neumann equation it has an additional term D(ρ) which induces dissipation and decoherence. I think it's also more natural than using non-hermitian Hamiltonians because you can derive it from the unitarian dynamics of the combined system "open system + environment" under certain assumptions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K