brajeshbeec
- 1
- 0
How do we differentiate the solution of Schrödinger equation for closed and open system.
The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the Schrödinger equation solutions for closed and open systems, exploring the implications of using density matrices versus wave functions, and the dynamics involved in each case.
Participants express differing views on the applicability and terminology of the Schrödinger equation in the context of open versus closed systems, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without clear consensus.
The discussion highlights the complexity of defining the Schrödinger equation's applicability, the role of different mathematical frameworks (density matrices, Liouville-von Neumann equation, non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Lindblad equation), and the assumptions underlying each approach.
I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.DrClaude said:The Schrödinger equation is the same. But for an open system, you have to solve it using the density matrix [...]
kith said:I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.
True, I didn't think about this. But you will only get dissipation with this, not decoherence. This doesn't change if you use the von Neumann equation (which is derived from the Schrödinger equation). Pure states are still mapped to pure states and the entropy doesn't change.DrClaude said:That said, you can also approximate an open system using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and use that in the Schrödinger equation, and have a non-unitary evolution of the wave function.