Schrodinger equation molecules

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing the full Schrödinger equation for a mixture of 75% H2 and 25% He, emphasizing the need to specify potentials and the Hamiltonian. Participants clarify that the Hamiltonian does not include wave-functions directly and that solving the equation for multiple particles is generally intractable without approximations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the Hamiltonian's role and the relationship between wave-functions and energy terms in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly multi-particle systems
  • Proficiency in differential equations and linear operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the full form of the time-independent Schrödinger equation for multi-particle systems
  • Learn about perturbation theory and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of wave-functions and their role in quantum systems
  • Investigate the Hamiltonian formulation for complex mixtures in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in multi-particle systems, Hamiltonian dynamics, and the Schrödinger equation's applications in chemical mixtures.

  • #31
So in SI units all I have to do with the kinetic energy term, bracketed T_n, is replace it with this:

- \sum^M_{A=1} ({\frac{h^2 \cdot m_e}{2 \cdot m_A} \cdot \nabla_A^2})

Where m_e is the mass of an electron, m_A is the mass of nucleus A and h (sorry I couldn't find h bar but that's what I meant) is the reduced Planck constant.

And put that into the second Hamiltonian and I would have created a complete SI unit version of the first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Big-Daddy you seem to have some very big misunderstandings. What book have you been studying quantum from?
 
  • #33
I don't study quantum mechanics on its own yet. I have just read the chapters in Atkins' Physical Chemistry.

Is my above expression correct?
 
  • #34
Big-Daddy said:
I don't study quantum mechanics on its own yet. I have just read the chapters in Atkins' Physical Chemistry.

Is my above expression correct?
If it is supposed to be kinetic energy, what are the units on the expression you put forth?

In any event, physical chemistry texts are really horrid on the whole at introducing quantum mechanics. If you want a book that is better, but still chemistry oriented, I'd recommend getting McQuarrie's Quantum Chemistry.
 
  • #35
Sorry, I noticed my answer isn't dimensionally sound. How about this one:

- \sum^M_{A=1} ({\frac{h^2}{2 \cdot m_A} \cdot \nabla_A^2})

I will look into certain books which show some development of more quantum ideas.
 
  • #36
Big-Daddy said:
Sorry, I noticed my answer isn't dimensionally sound. How about this one:

- \sum^M_{A=1} ({\frac{h^2}{2 \cdot m_A} \cdot \nabla_A^2})

I will look into certain books which show some development of more quantum ideas.
Close, it should be hbar but otherwise, so long as M is the number of particles in the system, that is fine.
 
  • #37
Thanks. And is energy (when we solve for it) a function of the position, or a numerical value for the system as a whole?
 
  • #38
Big-Daddy said:
Thanks. And is energy (when we solve for it) a function of the position, or a numerical value for the system as a whole?
It's the latter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K