Schrodinger's Equation: Find E for l=0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving Schrödinger's equation for a quantum mechanical problem involving a potential well defined by V(r) = -Vo for r ≤ a and V(r) = 0 for r > a. The specific focus is on finding the energy E for the case when the angular momentum quantum number l is set to 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether to set l = 0 before solving the general equation or to solve it first. There are attempts to express the wave function Ξ(r) in different regions and apply boundary conditions. Questions arise about the implications of boundary conditions and the meaning of certain terms in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided boundary conditions and explored the implications of energy estimates for l = 0. There is an ongoing inquiry into the minimum radius required for bound states and how this relates to the emission of light from the quantum dot. Multiple interpretations and approaches are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of estimating minimum radii for quantum dots and the conditions for bound states. There is a specific focus on the effective mass and potential energy values relevant to the problem.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[tex] \frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{d}{dr}\Psi (r)) + { \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}[E-V(r)] - \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}}\Psi (r) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] V(r) = -Vo r\leq a[/tex]
[tex] 0 r > a[/tex]Use
[tex] \Psi (r) = \Xi (r)/r[/tex]

Questions asks to Find E l = 0, do I solve the general equation first or should I make l = 0 right away?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's much easier to set l=0 first.
 
Inside the dot I get

[tex] <br /> \Xi (r) = C*Cos[l*r]+D*Sin[l*r]<br /> [/tex]

Outside the Dot I get

[tex] <br /> \Xi (r) = A*Exp[-k*r]+B[Exp[k*r]<br /> [/tex]
Taking r to infinity yields:

[tex] <br /> \Xi (r) = A*Exp[-k*r]<br /> [/tex]What other boundary conditions can I apply?
 
I took
[tex] \Xi (a) [/tex]
and
[tex] \frac{d\Xi}{dr}[/tex] at r = a

How would I solve these equations?
[tex] A*Exp[-k*a] = C*Cos[l*a]+D*Sin[l*a][/tex]
[tex] -kAExp[-k*a]=-C*l*Sin[l*a]+D*l*Cos[l*a][/tex]
 
Last edited:
[tex] \frac{h^2\pi^2}{8ma^2} < E + V < \frac{h^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}[/tex]

Now that's the energy for l=0. how would one want to estimtae the min radius to ensure at least one bound e-state?
 
NO bound states occur if a^2 < (pi^2 h^2 )/(8*m*Vo)

take positive root.

that's the minimum radius . Is that correct? if not I can't continue.

Now given this:

[tex] <br /> \frac{h^2\pi^2}{8ma^2} < E + V < \frac{h^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}[/tex]

letting V = 0.5 eV and m = 0.04*9.11x10^-31,
how can one find the colour of light in this circle?
 
Last edited:
what do you mean by: "Inside the dot I get " in post #3

This Boundary condition is good too:
[tex}] \Xi (r=0) = 0 [/tex]

Is the question to find [tex]E{l=0}[/tex]?

What is your "k" in post #3 ?

Is it an atomic physics problem? You are speaking about bound e-states
 
Take post #6 as a given.

how would one find the minimum radius
 
This was posted to me via private message T07:54

"question asks, estimate the min radii required of an InAs spherical quantum dot embedded in a GaAs matrix in order to ensure that there will be at least one bound electron state, or at least two bound states in the dot.

Choose V = 0.5 eV and effective mass m* = 0.04m in the dot and barrier layers. Does the separation in the energies between the two bound states tell you about the colour of light the dot would emit when excited?

If not, why not? What else would you need to do in order to obtain this information?

So since I found the bound states.
What do I need to solve for to answer the remaining questions?

I'm not sure about my minimum radius as I posted in the thread, is it correct?"
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K